How long will the media continue its gushing adoration of Barack
Obama? This is the question raised by the
adulatory prose of The Washington Post's Eli Saslow:
Between workouts during his Hawaii vacation this week, he was
photographed looking like the paradigm of a new kind of
presidential fitness, one geared less toward preventing heart
attacks than winning swimsuit competitions. The sun glinted off
chiseled pectorals sculpted during four weightlifting sessions
each week, and a body toned by regular treadmill runs and
basketball games.
Such "reporting" ought to make Saslow a laughingstock among the
hard-bitten cynics of the Washington press corps, because Obama's
gym enthusiasm is not really "a new kind of presidential
fitness." President Bush is ferociously fit, his
mountain-bike sessions notoriously grueling. Bush doesn't
make a habit of going around shirtless with the sun glinting off
his pecs, but a couch potato, he ain't.
At some point, hagiographic treatment of Obama will end, if only
because of market saturation. In 2008, Obama was featured
on the cover of Time 14 times, and 11 times on the
cover of Newsweek. and if the coverage wasn't always as
schoolgirl-giddy as Saslow's, it was overwhelmingly positive. The
news-consuming public will eventually tire of worshipful profile
features and stenographic accounts of Team Obama's talking
points.
The press corps' credibility and self-respect is at stake, when
Obama feels no compunction about chiding the Chicago
Tribune's John McCormick that he will "waste his
question" by asking about the Blagojevich scandal. And when
the transition team's self-exculpatory report about
l'affaire Blagojevich elicits chortles from the Los
Angeles Times --
"Obama team probe of Obama team finds no Obama team
impropriety" -- it becomes clear that some journalists are
tired of seeing Obama getting a free ride from their peers.