Expect to hear a lot
more of this in the year ahead, and not just from such noted
economic thinkers as Arianna Huffington: "The collapse of
Communism as a political system sounded the death knell for
Marxism as an ideology. But while laissez-faire capitalism has
been a monumental failure in practice, and soundly defeated at
the polls, the ideology is still alive and kicking." Ms.
Huffington isn't done yet, concluding, "It's time to relegate
free market fundamentalists to the same standing as Marxist
ideologues: intellectual curiosities occasionally trotted out as
relics of a failed philosophy."
No mention of the Federal Reserve's role in creating the bubble,
artificially low interest rates, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, the
Community Reinvestment Act, corporate welfare and crony
capitalism, the increasing socialization of risk and growing
federal role in the economy via the bailouts, the increases in
spending and regulation that occurred even under the Republicans,
or mark-to-market accounting. All of that is just "blame
shifting." Of course, no one argues that China's economic growth
over the past 20 years has breathed new life into communism. Why?
Because we all know that the Chinese Communist Party no longer
practices what can be called communism where it really counts for
the economy. Similarly, it is foolish to call what the
Republicans have delivered "laissez-faire capitalism" unless the
term has no meaning besides a mixed economy run by the GOP.
Whatever the failings of mainstream conservative economics -- and
there have been some -- the truly laissez-faire Austrian school
of economics was more accurate in its predictions about the
current crisis than Huffington's allies in Congress.
Of course, no one argues that China's economic growth over
the past 20 years has breathed new life into communism. Why?
Because we all know that the Chinese Communist Party no longer
practices what can be called communism where it really counts for
the economy. Similarly, it is foolish to call what the
Republicans have delivered "laissez-faire capitalism" unless the
term has no meaning besides a mixed economy run by the GOP.
Wasn't Tito's Yugoslavia a mercantile communism too, just more
sophisticated? Is the US headed towards something similar?
The impotence of all those presently in power is best illustrated
by Noonan's description of President Bush alerting everyone to
the latest development in the manner of a cuckoo clock.
And Mr. Paulson? What was the near-terrorism he employed all
about? Have all those bad 20s been collected? Why was the request
to take the time to think this through an impossibility?
We're not a free people, the bailouts tell you that. We're to
some sort of cabal born.
Robert Stacy McCain| 12.23.08 @ 12:22PM
Great. Huffington marries an oil billionaire, blows $25 million
trying to get him elected to the Senate, divorces him, makes off
with half his money, becomes a Democrat, and denounces
capitalism. It's like a morality play or something.
Ran| 12.23.08 @ 7:39PM
There's a term for mercantile communism... What, vaguely Italian.
Fascinating word. Tip o' me tongue... B'gins with an "F". Drat.
It'll come to me. To us all. That is, if Bush and the Demo
Congress haven't already delivered.
Ben Gee| 12.23.08 @ 8:19PM
China is no longer a communist country but it is a socialist
country. There are no pure capitalist economies because the
rights of society as a whole has to be considered. In China, the
rights of individual is subordinate to the right of the whole
society. If one follows the rules, there are no problems. If one
do not want to follow the rules, there is a problem.
In the West, we have rules too, one can get into trouble by not
following the rules too.
China is a very different country than it was 30 - 40 years ago.
China had moved much closer to the West in many ways and aquired
some of our problems. People now move much freer than they used
to and freer movement come with more crimes. Is there a happy
medium?
Mary| 12.23.08 @ 8:48PM
Ran-
Being Italian, let me help you out with the "vaguely Italian" :)
word that seems to be on the tip of your tongue. Fascism?
Not a bit of it Ran. Mussolini said fascism was really
"corporatism." That way you can eliminate the word mercantile
and communism.
"The bullets fly, Mussolini remains."
My father says my imitation of Mussolini is the best of all the
siblings. I've got the arms crossing, chin-jutting thing down.
Mary| 12.23.08 @ 11:55AM
Of course, no one argues that China's economic growth over the past 20 years has breathed new life into communism. Why? Because we all know that the Chinese Communist Party no longer practices what can be called communism where it really counts for the economy. Similarly, it is foolish to call what the Republicans have delivered "laissez-faire capitalism" unless the term has no meaning besides a mixed economy run by the GOP.
Wasn't Tito's Yugoslavia a mercantile communism too, just more sophisticated? Is the US headed towards something similar?
The impotence of all those presently in power is best illustrated by Noonan's description of President Bush alerting everyone to the latest development in the manner of a cuckoo clock.
And Mr. Paulson? What was the near-terrorism he employed all about? Have all those bad 20s been collected? Why was the request to take the time to think this through an impossibility?
We're not a free people, the bailouts tell you that. We're to some sort of cabal born.
Robert Stacy McCain| 12.23.08 @ 12:22PM
Great. Huffington marries an oil billionaire, blows $25 million trying to get him elected to the Senate, divorces him, makes off with half his money, becomes a Democrat, and denounces capitalism. It's like a morality play or something.
Ran| 12.23.08 @ 7:39PM
There's a term for mercantile communism... What, vaguely Italian. Fascinating word. Tip o' me tongue... B'gins with an "F". Drat. It'll come to me. To us all. That is, if Bush and the Demo Congress haven't already delivered.
Ben Gee| 12.23.08 @ 8:19PM
China is no longer a communist country but it is a socialist country. There are no pure capitalist economies because the rights of society as a whole has to be considered. In China, the rights of individual is subordinate to the right of the whole society. If one follows the rules, there are no problems. If one do not want to follow the rules, there is a problem.
In the West, we have rules too, one can get into trouble by not following the rules too.
China is a very different country than it was 30 - 40 years ago. China had moved much closer to the West in many ways and aquired some of our problems. People now move much freer than they used to and freer movement come with more crimes. Is there a happy medium?
Mary| 12.23.08 @ 8:48PM
Ran-
Being Italian, let me help you out with the "vaguely Italian" :) word that seems to be on the tip of your tongue. Fascism?
Not a bit of it Ran. Mussolini said fascism was really "corporatism." That way you can eliminate the word mercantile and communism.
"The bullets fly, Mussolini remains."
My father says my imitation of Mussolini is the best of all the siblings. I've got the arms crossing, chin-jutting thing down.