Timing is (almost) everything in politics, which is why I find
myself in disagreement
with
John O'Sullivan, Philip
Klein and Jennifer
Rubin over the question of whether Sarah Palin can afford to
skip the 2012 presidential campaign.
As I said in a comment on Phil's post, Jack Kemp might have been
president if he had been willing to challenge Bush 41 in either
the 1988 or '92 primaries, but instead waited until '96, by which
time his star had faded. I would also cite the case of Bill
Clinton, who was smart to launch a bid for the Democratic primary
in 1991, when Bush 41 looked unbeatable, thus allowing Clinton to
run against a relatively weak primary field. For that matter,
when
Barack Obama announced in January 2007 he would challenge
Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination, a lot of people
(including me) thought he was nuts.
If Obama has a successful two-term presidency -- almost by
definition, including national health care -- I don't see where
there's much point in conservatives caring who wins the White
House in 2016. The only real hope for the preservation of
economic freedom is for the Obama presidency to be a one-term
political debacle of Carteresque proportions, followed by a
Republican president with the kind of political charm necessary
to push for real free-market reforms.
Sorry to be so obstinate about this, and granting all caveats
about Palin's shortcomings, I really think she needs to be in a
full-immersion cram course to be ready to announce by January
2011. Otherwise, it may be too late for her -- and too late for
freedom. As Palin herself put it, "Don't let
me miss an open door."
Jack Kemp might have been president if he had been willing to
challenge Bush 41 in either the 1988 or '92 primaries, but
instead waited until '96, by which time his star had faded.
Actually, Kemp did run for President in '88 quite unsuccessfully
failing to claim the Reagan mantle and rallying conservatives.
Also, Kemp did NOT run for Presudent in 1996. He was nominated by
Dole for Veep that year.
You are correct, however. Kemp did miss his shot in 1992. Had he
followed through on his criticisms of Bush the Elder and
challenged him in the primary, Kemp may have short-circuited both
the Buchanan and Perot uprisings and coasted into the Presidency
against Bill Clinton in the general election.
Alan Brooks| 12.23.08 @ 4:25PM
Have you seen my eybrow pencil?
our very credibility is at stake.
Robert Stacy McCain| 12.23.08 @ 5:19PM
Thanks for the correction, Mr. Kleinheider. Shortly after I filed
that post, I thought to myself, "Hey, wait a minute . . . " but
shook it off. Should have thought to check my memory
before posting. Ah, well.
katie| 12.23.08 @ 8:11PM
Sarah Palin is just what we need, someone who makes Washington
scared! Come on Sarah lets shake things up!! Every day I look at
my Sarah Palin calendar and I am inspired to fight! She will make
it to the White House! (the calendar by the way, is on amazon,
and is GORGEOUS!! it also makes a great gift!!) SARAH PALIN
2012!!
Bill Dozier| 12.24.08 @ 3:32AM
In fact, somewhere on an old VHS tape I have one of the 1988
debates. When Bush said he wanted to be the "education president"
Kemp launched from his seat and looked as if he might explode.
I fail to comprehend the appreciation of Jack Kemp as the GOP's
Frederick Barbarossa. Kemp proved what kind of campaigner he was
when trying for VP under Dole in '96. He completely flopped, and
I've never seen a hint of charisma in any appearance from him
since.
Let's face it--if you allow Al Gore to handily out-debate you,
chances are you can't hope to attain the presidency.
J David| 12.23.08 @ 1:44PM
Rubin's a RINO, so it doesn't matter what she says, her opinion doesn't count.
Kleinheider| 12.23.08 @ 3:13PM
Jack Kemp might have been president if he had been willing to challenge Bush 41 in either the 1988 or '92 primaries, but instead waited until '96, by which time his star had faded.
Actually, Kemp did run for President in '88 quite unsuccessfully failing to claim the Reagan mantle and rallying conservatives.
Also, Kemp did NOT run for Presudent in 1996. He was nominated by Dole for Veep that year.
You are correct, however. Kemp did miss his shot in 1992. Had he followed through on his criticisms of Bush the Elder and challenged him in the primary, Kemp may have short-circuited both the Buchanan and Perot uprisings and coasted into the Presidency against Bill Clinton in the general election.
Alan Brooks| 12.23.08 @ 4:25PM
Have you seen my eybrow pencil?
our very credibility is at stake.
Robert Stacy McCain| 12.23.08 @ 5:19PM
Thanks for the correction, Mr. Kleinheider. Shortly after I filed that post, I thought to myself, "Hey, wait a minute . . . " but shook it off. Should have thought to check my memory before posting. Ah, well.
katie| 12.23.08 @ 8:11PM
Sarah Palin is just what we need, someone who makes Washington scared! Come on Sarah lets shake things up!! Every day I look at my Sarah Palin calendar and I am inspired to fight! She will make it to the White House! (the calendar by the way, is on amazon, and is GORGEOUS!! it also makes a great gift!!) SARAH PALIN 2012!!
Bill Dozier| 12.24.08 @ 3:32AM
In fact, somewhere on an old VHS tape I have one of the 1988 debates. When Bush said he wanted to be the "education president" Kemp launched from his seat and looked as if he might explode.
Dai Alanye| 12.24.08 @ 5:34PM
I fail to comprehend the appreciation of Jack Kemp as the GOP's Frederick Barbarossa. Kemp proved what kind of campaigner he was when trying for VP under Dole in '96. He completely flopped, and I've never seen a hint of charisma in any appearance from him since.
Let's face it--if you allow Al Gore to handily out-debate you, chances are you can't hope to attain the presidency.
biniki| 8.28.09 @ 10:32PM
bikini
bikini swimwear