The idea that Caroline Kennedy would be considered a plausible
appointment for the U.S. Senate is absolutely sickening. She has
absolutely nothing to qualify her for the job, other than this
Kennedy thing that's been going on for a half-century. Dynastic
politics in America is troubling as a general rule, but this
brings it to a whole other level. At least when Bush used his
father's name, he had to defeat a sitting Texas governor in 1994,
and win a tough presidential election in 2000. Even Hillary
Clinton, when she came to New York, at least had to put in some
leg work when she ran for Senate to overcome charges she was a
carpetbagger. She campaigned tirelessly upstate, dealt with media
scrutiny, and debated a paper-waving Rick Lazio. It's one thing
if Caroline Kennedy wants to jump through all the hoops needed to
run for Senate, and allow New Yorkers to decided whether or not
they want to send somebody who is completely unqualified to
represent them in Washington -- if people in the state are that
pathetically starstruck, then that's their choice. But for a
Kennedy to get appointed to the Senate without doing
anything at all to work for it other than raising her hand, is
truly an abomination. And let's be clear on what's going on --
Democrats are intrigued by her huge fundraising potential. Is
there really much difference between Blagojevich's attempt to
sell a Senate seat, and what would be taking place if Patterson
appointed Kennedy, and had her help him with fundraising when he
runs for reelection? I have to say, I was too young to be around
for the days of JFK and RFK, so I have always found the Kennedy
obsession, particularly among Baby Boomers, to be utterly
obnoxious and nauseating (as evidenced by Ruth Marcus's
embarassing Caroline is a
fairytale princess column). It was a great national tragedy
when JFK was assassinated, but that was 45 years ago. How many
Senate seats do we have to hand the family on a silver platter
before we can move on?