Quin
Hillyer's excellent column urging Republican opposition to
Hillary Clinton's nomination as Secretary of State offers
interesting political possibilities.
First, tough questioning during Hillary's confirmation hearings
would give Republicans a chance to play on familiar turf,
emptying out the oppo-research files (see
Amanda Carpenter's Dossier, for starters). The New
York-based media loves any Hillary-related news and so, at a bare
minimum, the GOP could get a week's worth of front-page headlines
out of the hearings.
Second, a real fight over Hillary's nomination would give
Republicans a chance to establish the "corruption" meme at the
outset of the Obama administration. The Clinton connection --
including all of Bill's shadowy conflicts of interest -- ties
Obama to the politics of the past (rather than Hope and Change)
and a confirmation fight will help cement that connection in the
public mind.
Hillary is less popular than Obama, and so opposition to
Clinton's confirmation presents an opportunity for the GOP to
score points indirectly against the Messiah. And there are enough
Clinton-hating "progressives" among Obama's supporters that
Republican senators could count on a certain amount of grassroots
Democratic support in the confirmation fight.
Could Senate Republicans actually defeat the Clinton nomination?
Probably not, but that doesn't mean it isn't worth trying.
Remember that Clinton was more or less imposed on Obama as the
price of "solidarity" during the fall campaign. If the
confirmation hearings were to turn up anything really damaging
against Hillary, Obama wouldn't really regret having to withdraw
her nomination.