Barack Obama isn't even President yet, and he's already
angering some of his most devoted followers on the party's left
wing. This is the mark of what could be a very successful
presidency.
"With its congressional majority, the Democratic Party has
refused to seriously try to end the war, to stop the bailout
and to stop the trampling of civil liberties, just to name a
few off the top of my head," wrote David Sirota on the popular
liberal blog OpenLeft, decrying the serial betrayals of Obama
and the congressional Democratic majority. The Democratic
Party, he wrote, has "faced no real retribution" for its
manifold heresies, something that Sirota believes he and his
band of angry bloggers must change. "We better understand why
this happened," he fumed.
Allow me to provide an answer. You don't matter.
Kirchick goes on to detail the failure of left-wing bloggers to
force Senate Democrats to punish their longtime nemesis, Sen. Joe
Lieberman, for his support of Republican John McCain. This is
evidence, Kirchick says, "that the leadership of the Democratic
Party isn't as petty, vindictive and small as its left-wing
supporters."
Naturally, the "petty, vindictive and small" bloggers are angry
-- at Kirchick. So what do they do?
Gay-baiting:
He'd be a classic Uncle Tom is he was African-American. Instead
he's a very unhappy gay wingnut, a sad species indeed, forever
obsessed with trying to justify his pitiful existence.
That's from a left-wing blogger whose post is headlined, "Jamie
Kirchick Poops His Panties Because He Wants Attention." Exactly
how is Kirchick's sexuality related to the topic at hand? Not at
all. But this is how the Netroots operate, lashing out venomously
at anyone who criticizes or opposes them. Tomorrow, they'll be
back to bashing conservatives as "homophobes," without irony.
Geez, can't they just register their displeasure by stating
facts? I truly don't understand the immediate impulse to villify
anyone who doesn't tow the "party" line. Your comment about
calling conservatives "homophobes" without irony after nasty
homophobic comments about one of their own is an example of
Orwell's "doublethink."
Dan| 11.23.08 @ 2:14PM
I think Kirchik is mostly right, except for the fact that the
liberal activists in the party were candidate Obama's earliest
base of support while all the establishment types and
conventional wisdom (initially at least) looked to Hillary.
So, RSM did you zip over to 009 and buy the "Hot:Fastest
WotLK Perfect 1-80 Package" @ $258.99 or the economical
"WOW Lv60-70 package:Save $30 and 2000G for free" @
$41.99?
Deborah Durkee| 11.23.08 @ 12:46PM
Geez, can't they just register their displeasure by stating facts? I truly don't understand the immediate impulse to villify anyone who doesn't tow the "party" line. Your comment about calling conservatives "homophobes" without irony after nasty homophobic comments about one of their own is an example of Orwell's "doublethink."
Dan| 11.23.08 @ 2:14PM
I think Kirchik is mostly right, except for the fact that the liberal activists in the party were candidate Obama's earliest base of support while all the establishment types and conventional wisdom (initially at least) looked to Hillary.
Matthew Vadum| 11.23.08 @ 5:33PM
Don't you mean, Nutroots, RSM?
Robert Stacy McCain| 11.23.08 @ 11:27PM
World of Warcraft spam comments! You know you've really arrived when you start getting that crap in your comments field.
Agent Orange Peel| 11.24.08 @ 2:35AM
So, RSM did you zip over to 009 and buy the "Hot:Fastest WotLK Perfect 1-80 Package" @ $258.99 or the economical "WOW Lv60-70 package:Save $30 and 2000G for free" @ $41.99?