The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Lieberman the Survivor

Democrats let Joe Lieberman keep his chairmanship.

The netroots are already apoplectic.

In a post titled, "Suck On That, Liberals," Jane Hamsher writes:

Cillizza: "Asked what it would mean if Lieberman kept his chairmanship, one Senate Democratic   aide said bluntly: "The left has been foiled again. They can rant and rage but they still             do not put the fear into folks to actually change their votes. Their influence would be in question."

I hope this puts to rest the notion that this is all some master stroke of kumbayah, of keeping your friends close and your enemies closer.

This is about telling you that you mean nothing. That democracy is a nice word, but it should never threaten the entitlement of the most exclusive club in the world.

No matter what Joe Lieberman does, the people who are protecting him hate you much more than they hate him.

Kos adds:

There's that. But there's also disdain for the American electorate that voted in overwhelming numbers for change from the discredited Bush/McCain/Lieberman policies. But in a city known for tone-deafness, there clearly isn't a more tone-deaf group than the Senate Dems.

I'm done with Reid as Senate leader.

Meanwhile, as I write, a poll of DailyKos readers finds that 85 percent do not approve of Harry Reid as majority leader, compared with 8 percent who approve.

Always angry, even in victory.

View all comments (4) | Leave a comment

Oliver| 11.18.08 @ 4:22PM

Yawn... Keep trying, American Spectator.

Who's "angry" and who cares about this? People who read political blogs all the time and people who obsess over politics, that's who.

No normal person actually cares. Hell, I read a half a dozen political blogs a day. You know what? I don't care that Liebermann kept his chairmanship. Why would I? It doesn't matter; it's not important; it only registers as being important to wonkish bloggers.

You guys will have much practice is writing irrelevant blogs for the next eight years; it's good to hear you sharpening the knives of irrelevancy already.

Carry on.

WendyG| 11.18.08 @ 5:29PM

*Snicker* Lieberman prevails!

Just wait until Coleman wins the recount.

But I must say I am surprised that the odious and infantile Kos made it through a post without hurling the F-bomb.

ruth| 11.19.08 @ 1:57AM

Always nuts, even in victory.

ruth| 11.19.08 @ 2:00AM

Oliver, you are optimistic: You fools will implode long before that.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/11/18/lieberman-the-survivor
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Middle-Aged Man Takes a Holiday

Christopher Orlet | 2.9.12

ADVERTISEMENT