The American Spectator : The Spectacle Blog : 'Paranoia and Vitriol'

Text Size

'Paranoia and Vitriol'

By Robert Stacy McCain on 11.14.08 @ 12:50PM

Jennifer Rubin suggests that I've misrepresented her arguments, and perhaps so. She calls to my attention her two final paragraphs:

So perhaps Republicans can take their cue not just from Haley Barbour, but also from Rahm Emanuel. If the former provides a guide to policy - pragmatic, relevant, a mix of fiscal sanity with effective middle-class services - the latter gives the clue on candidates. It was Emanuel, who as head of the Democratic Congressional Committee teamed up with Sen. Chuck Schumer to recruit candidates around the country to fit constituents in diverse locales. The result was two successive Congressional cycles in which attractive Democratic candidates, well-matched ideologically to their districts and states, made substantial gains, and thereby lifted the Democrats to comfortable majorities in the House and Senate.
So the Republicans have their work cut out for them, just as the Democrats did following their losses in 2000 and 2004. Devise center-right policies on bread-and-butter issues to woo back swing voters. Look to the governors for policy innovation. But politics does not operate in a vacuum or in the newpaper columns of pundits. Ultimately the GOP must find candidates who may diverge from the party "line" but can win over voters outside conservative strongholds. It is not an impossible task but it will be that much more difficult if Republicans maintain a tone of class resentment, paranoia, and vitriol and adhere to policy positions which are either extraneous or offensive to large segments of the electorate. The choice is up to them: become the Dixiecrats of the 21st century or forge a new Republican majority.

With the first bolded section, I have no quarrel. It's the second section that is troubling. Democrats have certainly never shied away from class resentment (that eeeevilll top 5 percent!) and while there are indeed some paranoid, vitriolic Republicans, we shouldn't blame the entire party for Sean Hannity's shortcomings.

As to conservatism being "offensive to large segments of the electorate" -- well, yes, those segments are called "liberals."

View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

Capt. Wittington| 11.14.08 @ 1:16PM

Yes, and they are a LARGE segment of the electorate.

J David| 11.14.08 @ 1:17PM

Away with RINO Rubin, more Ann Coulter - Rush Limbaugh conservatives, who acyually know what "conservative" means! I WANT to hear some PARANOIA(is it paranoia when they really DO mean to end conservatism FOREVER?!) and some serious vitriol against Marxists and RINOs who enable them.

Captain America| 11.14.08 @ 1:59PM

What Chuckles Schumer and Rahm did is called "micro targeting". The problem with micro targeting candidates on a national ticket is that they do not work in a vacuum.

So, while Democrats get conservative Democrats elected into national offices in southern states, for example, these same office holders are expected to vote the party line lead by Pelosi and Reid.

What good does a conservative Democrat do for their party leaders when, in the interest of gaining or retaining their positions, they vote against the party line?

This tension will become increasingly evident when the new Congress takes shape in 2009. Rest assured, the Democrat office holders who represent a conservative electorate and are up for reelection in 2010 will be voting with the Republicans.

Conversely, does anyone seriously see Sens. Collins and Snow Republicans? Even Reid considers them a lock for Democrats.

I too take issue with Jen's proposed solution. If anyone played "class warfare" it was Obama and company.