There is a lot of nonsense in this
PJ O'Rourke piece in the current Weekly Standard
(it's always sad to see a funny guy become a scold), but he's
dead on when it comes to taxes and spending (Hat tip:
Dan McCarthy):
Anyway, a low tax rate is not--never mind the rhetoric of every
conservative politician--a bedrock principle of conservatism.
The principle is fiscal responsibility.
Conservatives should never say to voters, "We can lower your
taxes." Conservatives should say to voters, "You can raise
spending. You, the electorate, can, if you choose, have an
infinite number of elaborate and expensive government programs.
But we, the government, will have to pay for those programs. We
have three ways to pay.
"We can inflate the currency, destroying your ability to plan
for the future, wrecking the nation's culture of thrift and
common sense, and giving free rein to scallywags to borrow
money for worthless scams and pay it back 10 cents on the
dollar.
"We can raise taxes. If the taxes are levied across the board,
money will be taken from everyone's pocket, the economy will
stagnate, and the poorest and least advantaged will be harmed
the most. If the taxes are levied only on the wealthy, money
will be taken from wealthy people's pockets, hampering their
capacity to make loans and investments, the economy will
stagnate, and the poorest and the least advantaged will be
harmed the most.
"And we can borrow, building up a massive national debt. This
will cause all of the above things to happen plus it will fund
Red Chinese nuclear submarines that will be popping up in San
Francisco Bay to get some decent Szechwan take-out."
It was bad enough to run deficits in the 1980s when we had to
fight stagflation and the Cold War at the same. Back then,
however, we needed to peel back 70 percent tax rates while
simultaneously repairing our defense capabilities. Unfortunately,
everyone took the wrong lessons from the Reagan-era deficits.
Those who noticed the red ink decided that tax cuts cause
deficits and that tax hikes are the best way to balance the
budget. Those who noticed the phenomenal economic growth decided
that deficits don't matter and that Republicans could fight
tax-and-spend with borrow-and-spend. Repeat after me: big
spending is the enemy of low taxes.
Just a little thought here. What about the Federal Government
handling only that which is mandated to handle under the
constitution? Defense, regulation of interstate trade, and
enforcement of Constitutional provisions and amendments? If we
did away with all of the unconstitutional boondoggles that the
federal government engages in [welfare, social security, labor,
agricultural and other business subsidies, etc.], we might end up
with the lowest tax rate in the industrial world.
Just a thought.
Thomas| 11.11.08 @ 4:40PM
Just a little thought here. What about the Federal Government handling only that which is mandated to handle under the constitution? Defense, regulation of interstate trade, and enforcement of Constitutional provisions and amendments? If we did away with all of the unconstitutional boondoggles that the federal government engages in [welfare, social security, labor, agricultural and other business subsidies, etc.], we might end up with the lowest tax rate in the industrial world.
Just a thought.