The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

There is a lot of nonsense in this PJ O'Rourke piece in the current Weekly Standard (it's always sad to see a funny guy become a scold), but he's dead on when it comes to taxes and spending (Hat tip: Dan McCarthy):

Anyway, a low tax rate is not--never mind the rhetoric of every conservative politician--a bedrock principle of conservatism. The principle is fiscal responsibility.

Conservatives should never say to voters, "We can lower your taxes." Conservatives should say to voters, "You can raise spending. You, the electorate, can, if you choose, have an infinite number of elaborate and expensive government programs. But we, the government, will have to pay for those programs. We have three ways to pay.

"We can inflate the currency, destroying your ability to plan for the future, wrecking the nation's culture of thrift and common sense, and giving free rein to scallywags to borrow money for worthless scams and pay it back 10 cents on the dollar.

"We can raise taxes. If the taxes are levied across the board, money will be taken from everyone's pocket, the economy will stagnate, and the poorest and least advantaged will be harmed the most. If the taxes are levied only on the wealthy, money will be taken from wealthy people's pockets, hampering their capacity to make loans and investments, the economy will stagnate, and the poorest and the least advantaged will be harmed the most.

"And we can borrow, building up a massive national debt. This will cause all of the above things to happen plus it will fund Red Chinese nuclear submarines that will be popping up in San Francisco Bay to get some decent Szechwan take-out."

It was bad enough to run deficits in the 1980s when we had to fight stagflation and the Cold War at the same. Back then, however, we needed to peel back 70 percent tax rates while simultaneously repairing our defense capabilities. Unfortunately, everyone took the wrong lessons from the Reagan-era deficits. Those who noticed the red ink decided that tax cuts cause deficits and that tax hikes are the best way to balance the budget. Those who noticed the phenomenal economic growth decided that deficits don't matter and that Republicans could fight tax-and-spend with borrow-and-spend. Repeat after me: big spending is the enemy of low taxes.

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

Thomas| 11.11.08 @ 4:40PM

Just a little thought here. What about the Federal Government handling only that which is mandated to handle under the constitution? Defense, regulation of interstate trade, and enforcement of Constitutional provisions and amendments? If we did away with all of the unconstitutional boondoggles that the federal government engages in [welfare, social security, labor, agricultural and other business subsidies, etc.], we might end up with the lowest tax rate in the industrial world.
Just a thought.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/11/11/a-republican-party-reptile-no

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT