The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Mr. Obama, President

When Senator Obama had suggested that there was a righteous wind at his back, he was criticized as being somewhat presumptuous. But he was, to a great extent, correct. There was a wind at his back, and it could be observed in those who were excited for him. McCain, on the other hand, was himself winded.

There is an excitement surrounding Obama that never could have been conjured by McCain. It is, in fact, surprising that McCain was ever able to get so far without it. Indeed, experience is an excellent qualifier, but experience is not magic. And those who pulled the lever did so in the hopes that maybe this longshot candidate could fulfill their dreams for the country. That pull of the lever was, of course, similar to working the slot machine, and we will not truly know if it will pay off any time soon. But it is not insignificant that so many felt the need to gamble in the first place.

Here in the rain-soaked streets of Washington, young and old, but all excited, voters swarm in and out of cars. The honking (frequently three staccato beeps) accompanies cheers of a name. Posters sway. Driving past the White House, Lafayette Square Park gathered more onlookers. Where they once stood and wondered "What if," has finally, for them, changed to "Now that."

That excitement is real. Yes, this is a historical moment, and one we should be proud of it. A legacy of racism and slavery has been strongly rejected in this election. And Barack Obama's greatest strength turned out to be his inexperience. There was so small a record to point to, it was far easier for people hopeful for change to turn to him as the embodiment of their hopes. There was little to contradict them. What he lacked in experience, they made up for themselves. History was less important than simply making history.

Some see this as a recipe for disaster. A survey of blogs around the web note, almost gleefully, that this man will completely and utterly fail. He can't help to, they say. This is foolishness. No one really knows. But a serious opposition ought to take its opponent seriously. More seriously, one hopes, than it did during the campaign.

What do conservatives have to look forward to? Years in opposition, something in which they excel. It's easier to fight the growth of government than to govern without growth. And while certainly the policies ushered forward in coming years won't be favorable to those who would prefer to live with liberty, they will definitely animate a movement struggling to define itself against what it isn't. If nothing else, it's a helping hand.

In this sense, I wish this for our dear readers. Do not be angry conservatives. Do not let the politics overrule your day-to-day lives. Continue living (to the extent you can) without concern for what the State might do. In this sense, we are so very different from the left. We won't allow anger to guide our discourse. Instead, I hope it'll be optimism. We will no doubt have fights ahead for the soul of American politics, but our own souls should remain unaffected. There are, after all, greater things.

This republic has a new president, baptized in the bloodless revolutions we enjoy every four years. Think about the woman in Iraq who holds her finger aloft, coated in purple dye. Just because we've practiced this so often for so long doesn't mean it should thrill us any less.

Whatever politics are to come, please remember this one thing: We are free.

God bless America.

View all comments (6) | Leave a comment

Captain America| 11.5.08 @ 2:18AM

Look, the historical significance of America electing its first Afro-American president is not lost on me. But my reading of Martin Luther King's dream was for his children to be judged not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

That said, who is Barack Obama other than a person who has shared what it is that he wants us to know about him and nothing more. We do have a good sense of his character which, frankly, is troublesome.

I don't know about the chosen associations of past presidents, but Obama's selections are dreadful. He may be the only president in US history to give the finger to his primary opponent and his general election opponent. One time is explained away, a second occurrence becomes a pattern. And, in both cases he was winning or had won. What does that say about being a gracious winner?

Disgusted, Not Angry| 11.5.08 @ 2:53AM

I've been an AmSpec reader since the mid 80's, and I'm gagging on this rah rah speech. After those great days of Ronald Reagen, we're right back where we started, as far as the prospects for liberty are concerned.

Far too many Conservatives went along willingly for the ride over the past eight years. That includes, in my opinion, this publication. And now you implore me to think philosophically? Yeah, right.

I stopped believing that Republicans were serious about limiting government years ago. Whatever they say now while "in opposition" will have zero credibility with me.

Henry| 11.5.08 @ 10:04AM

Such blather about electing an African-American. That a minority has a chance to be president is a testament to the American idea. But, where did it say we were supposed to settle for the first one, the wrong one? I think it is much more historic that we elected our first out-and-out Marxist president. This is how President Government should be measured; not by race, but by ideas. His are bad ideas, and he uses the tactics of Marxists past (Alinsky) in part to prey on the moral confusion and fatigue found in today's America.

God help us.

a. guess| 11.5.08 @ 1:35PM

"We are free" as in, "Don't worry readers, Barack Obama can't take away our freedoms" or "We are free, unlike those un-free socialists over in Europe"?

J. Peter Freire| 11.5.08 @ 1:49PM

Andy, you know just how un-hyperbolic I am. It was intended as, "political defeats should not define how lucky we are to be here," continuing the theme of "conservatives, please don't become the angry right the same way the left has been."

ruth| 11.5.08 @ 5:43PM

I don't want to be the 'angry right' and i'm damn sick of being the wimpy right.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by J.P. Freire

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/11/05/mr-obama-president
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Thank Him, Santorum!

Jay D. Homnick | 2.8.12

The Best CPAC Ever

Robert Stacy McCain | 2.8.12

ADVERTISEMENT