Some of the early exit polls suggested that California's
Proposition 8 might lose narrowly (though I see CNN's weighted
exits are now more
consistent with the actual results). With 95 percent of
precincts reporting, it looks all but certain that it is
going to pass despite a Democratic landslide in the state, the
controversy over the initiative's wording, and the fact that
same-sex marriage was already in effect. All along, I suspected
large numbers of black and Hispanic voters would turn out to vote
for Barack Obama and against gay marriage. (Blacks, Hispanics,
and Asians also voted more
pro-life than whites.) With Arizona easily adopting a ballot
initiative that was less broadly worded than the one that failed
in 2006, every state that has gotten to vote on gay marriage has
rejected it -- even blue states and states that have voted for it
more than once. The only states that have adoped this innovation
are the ones where the people can't vote or, in Massachusetts'
case, the politicians won't let them.
That last is also the case in Maryland, where the legislature has
twice successfully used procedural tactics to keep the voters
from having a chance to vote on a constitutional amendment. We
might do something we'd regret, see, so they're just protecting
us from us ourselves. Nice reasoning!
No1Inpartikuelar| 11.5.08 @ 1:53PM
This is the only thing I find disappointing about us as
Americans. We did break ground yesterday with Obama's
presidential election but I can't help but feel that we've
stepped back a bit on an issue that I never felt was a political
issue at all. Gay rights have been trampled on in my home state
and soon in California as well. There is not sanctity in marriage
other then the one a married couple creates, and to assume that 2
people who are gay and in love and want to spend the rest of
they're lives together is a threat to a bound that thousands of
straight couples get to share is absurd.....
lastly, Massachusetts' stance on not allowing it's people to vote
on amendment issues is a good one. The masses change their
opinion all the time. At one time the masses thought less of
black people and people of color. Yesterday we elected an African
American to the most powerful position in the world (and I am so
proud of our nation right now because of it. I can tell my kids
(if I ever have any) that they can be president and I have proof
now that your color won't matter.) and if people can change their
opinion about a race or ethnicity then how can the people make a
decision to amend something about a persons lifestyle. I guess
what I'm saying is that the people shouldn't be the ones making
the amendments to "govern" people but rather making amendments to
protect people. in all I think that's what's really important
about amendments is that they are there to protect us not tell us
what to do and an amendment like the one here in Arizona to
define marriage as a union between a man and a woman is not what
I know of the American ideal....
We did good by electing a black man into office but we failed a
gay brothers and sisters by telling we don't want to see them
married.
Bobbi| 11.5.08 @ 4:42PM
That's ok by me. Call me homophobic if you will. I refuse to give
in to the homosexual revolution. Marriage is specifically made
for a man and a woman, period. Obviously 62% of Floridians and a
majority of Californians agree.
ruth| 11.5.08 @ 10:55PM
Excuse me while I cry crocodile tears. Someone has got to stop
the tyranny of the judiciary!
Although Obama has run his campaign Organic Pigmentsalmost
completely as a to the administration of one George Ink Pigments the parallels
between their campaigns are apparent.
Kimberly| 11.5.08 @ 12:51PM
That last is also the case in Maryland, where the legislature has twice successfully used procedural tactics to keep the voters from having a chance to vote on a constitutional amendment. We might do something we'd regret, see, so they're just protecting us from us ourselves. Nice reasoning!
No1Inpartikuelar| 11.5.08 @ 1:53PM
This is the only thing I find disappointing about us as Americans. We did break ground yesterday with Obama's presidential election but I can't help but feel that we've stepped back a bit on an issue that I never felt was a political issue at all. Gay rights have been trampled on in my home state and soon in California as well. There is not sanctity in marriage other then the one a married couple creates, and to assume that 2 people who are gay and in love and want to spend the rest of they're lives together is a threat to a bound that thousands of straight couples get to share is absurd.....
lastly, Massachusetts' stance on not allowing it's people to vote on amendment issues is a good one. The masses change their opinion all the time. At one time the masses thought less of black people and people of color. Yesterday we elected an African American to the most powerful position in the world (and I am so proud of our nation right now because of it. I can tell my kids (if I ever have any) that they can be president and I have proof now that your color won't matter.) and if people can change their opinion about a race or ethnicity then how can the people make a decision to amend something about a persons lifestyle. I guess what I'm saying is that the people shouldn't be the ones making the amendments to "govern" people but rather making amendments to protect people. in all I think that's what's really important about amendments is that they are there to protect us not tell us what to do and an amendment like the one here in Arizona to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman is not what I know of the American ideal....
We did good by electing a black man into office but we failed a gay brothers and sisters by telling we don't want to see them married.
Bobbi| 11.5.08 @ 4:42PM
That's ok by me. Call me homophobic if you will. I refuse to give in to the homosexual revolution. Marriage is specifically made for a man and a woman, period. Obviously 62% of Floridians and a majority of Californians agree.
ruth| 11.5.08 @ 10:55PM
Excuse me while I cry crocodile tears. Someone has got to stop the tyranny of the judiciary!
pigment Red| 4.4.10 @ 6:02AM
pigment Red
czmaxpct@gmail.com
Although Obama has run his campaign Organic Pigmentsalmost completely as a to the administration of one George Ink Pigments the parallels between their campaigns are apparent.