The Spectacle Blog

Re: Tonight: on Heartland with John Kasich

By on 12.17.05 | 5:31PM

Jed, good work last night and good luck tonight. But one thing I'm still trying to figure out is why would the President not simply use the law on the books to approach secret courts for approval on these taps?

The only way my imagination can rationalize it is by seeing the surveillance as a far broader activity than could possibly be performed if warrants had to be sought regularly from the "secret court," which I imagine looks something like Judge Judy's court, only with worse lighting and smoke for effect.

The press seems incredulous at the moment that Bush actually offered frank honesty as a result of this. The New York Times offered:

Send to Kindle

Tonight: on Heartland with John Kasich

By on 12.17.05 | 2:57PM

I'll be on Fox again, this time on "Heartland with John Kasich" tonight about 8 pm EST, talking about the NSA intel flap. The more I research this, the more likely it seems that the president acted legally. But there's still a lot of law to read. More Monday in Loose Canons.

Send to Kindle

Patriot Games

By on 12.17.05 | 9:09AM

Orin Kerr has the distinction of being one of the rare participants in the Patriot Act debate who actually knows what he's talking about (he was a Justice Department lawyer from 1998-2001 and has testified before Congress more than once on Patriot Act arcana). He writes:

Send to Kindle

Big Story

By on 12.16.05 | 2:15PM

I'll be on tonight with John Gibson about 5 pm on FNC talking about the New York Times story on the president's domestic intelligence operations through NSA. Stay tuned.

Send to Kindle

The People’s Business?

By on 12.16.05 | 12:52PM

So now we have a filibuster of the PATRIOT Act extension following hard upon Mr. McCain's success in getting his al Qaeda bill of rights agreed on. How many ways can Congress spell "surrender"?

I just love what ol' Leaky Leahy said about the PATRIOT Act. He wants to mend it, not end it. Where have we heard that before?

Send to Kindle

Even more on Wikipedia

By on 12.16.05 | 11:21AM

Earlier this week, Robert McHenry offered fairly devastating criticism of Wikipedia in this article. Having been Editor in Chief of the Encyclopædia Britannica, McHenry argues effectively:

I was once an encyclopedia editor, but I wasn’t one just because I said so. It’s not like being an artist, after all. When I began I first learned to proofread, then to fiddle about with galleys and page proofs, then to fact-check, then to write clearly and concisely, and so on; at length I learned (so we agreed to say) editorial judgment. Late in my days I took a hand in training others. There really is something to the job -- skills, knowledge, experience, and maybe even a touch of talent.

Send to Kindle

Re: D.C.’s Weak Constitution

By on 12.16.05 | 10:51AM

I went to school in upstate New York, and found that classes never stopped for inclement weather. Even though I lived on campus, I can tell you getting to school was perilous; not because there was snow on the ground, but because the bridges and/or hills necessary to get to the main campus were terribly plowed, and more slippery than one might expect. There remains a stretch of road that leads downhill, running along the side of one of the numerous gorges, that has yet to be properly fenced beyond ramshackle wooden posts.

Many contend the more macabre statistics indicating student fatalities were more to do with bad winter maintenance than mental health.

Send to Kindle

Defining Judicial Activism

By on 12.16.05 | 10:25AM

The Federalist Society held another fine event yesterday at the National Press Club, which a few of us from the office had the pleasure of attending. Titled "Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint: Is the Alito Nomination Sharpening the Debate?" the debate featured Wendy Long of the Judicial Confirmation Network; Prof. Stephen B. Presser, TAS contributor and of Northwestern School of Law; Seth Rosenthal of Alliance for Justice; and Prof. Jonathan Turley of the GW Law School. Stuart Taylor, National Journal columnist did his best to keep the comity high and verbosity low.

The entire hour-and-a-half session was entertaining and enlightening, so it's difficult to choose from the highlights. In the course of this last year of judicial controversy, the left has managed to muddle the definition of "judicial activism" and water it down merely to mean not deferring to democratic choice.

Send to Kindle

Re: Christmas

By on 12.16.05 | 9:26AM

But then, what to say of the culture war? This is hardly a Manichaean struggle, but speaking to a very spirited maternal parental unit who is Christian, but is also fairly secular, I understood there was a little more to the simplicity of earlier times.

The Macy's Thanksgiving Parade, for example, concludes with Santa Claus. Yet if you go into Macy's, they will wish you a Happy Holiday. Yet I'm sure if a survey was taken, Macy's would find a majority of its sales were specifically for Christmas shopping.

One thing you said in your article was that businesses don't have to observe those holidays for which they are being patronized, but is that really a wise strategy? Interestingly, things appear inverse. Veteran's Day or Memorial Day, for example, have regular sales where the holiday is only barely observed, but plastered all over. There's no shame in advertising that a grill is at its lowest price ever for Memorial Day, but there's hesitation in advertising the same for Christmas because of the looming threat of some PC Brigade.

Send to Kindle