Unlike some people, I don't require an Electoral College victory
scenario to justify my vote. I just voted for Bob Barr. I vowed
on Feb. 7 -- the day Mitt Romney suspended his campaign -- that
I'd vote Libertarian this year, and I did.
I reject the idea that it is a "wasted vote" to vote for anyone
but a winner (or a contender). That is an appeal to bandwagon
psychology. I also reject the idea that it's somehow unpatriotic
not to vote. "Freedom from politics" is one of the most important
freedoms we have. If you examine the demographics of non-voters,
frankly . . . thank God for apathy!
Also, I took my 19-year-old daughter to vote for the first time
today. She is an education major, wants to be an elementary
school teacher, and hates No Child Left Behind. She
refuses to tell me who she voted for, but she did get a personal
phone pitch from Bob Barr this morning.
I don't really see how you could go from the Bush-twin Romney to
Barr - but I'm glad you did. I'm a FairTax junkie, so it was
naturally for me to go from Huckabee to Barr. I live in Arizona
and see first hand how McCain is clueless to what is going on in
his own state - which shows you how clueless he would be as
President.
You voted for Barr on principle - you are never wasting your vote
when you vote on principle. The accusation that it would be a
wasted vote would be just plain offensive.
se7en| 11.4.08 @ 1:06PM
TE,
I completely reject your naive notion that Romney is a
"Bush-twin."
It figures you were a Huckabee supporter. Go populism? Huckabee's
views on the economy are a disgrace to the Republican party.
WendyG| 11.4.08 @ 1:25PM
With all due respect, a vote for Barr is effectively a vote for
Obama, no matter how else you try to spin it.
midge| 11.4.08 @ 1:59PM
i congratulate you for voting on principle. that's what democracy
is often about.
as for your daughter, if she didn't want to tell you for whom she
voted, and if demographics tell us anything, and if the fact that
*you* lean right tells us anything, she voted obama.
Jaxon| 11.4.08 @ 2:31PM
I too don't understand the jump from Romney to Barr. I voted
Libertarian for almost every office they were on the ballot for.
This is the true party of the people. They are the only party
left that still holds the values of which this country was
started. And they need to increase their support so more people
hear their message.
I would have voted for Ron Paul or possibly Huckabee (he believes
in small govt, fair tax), but never Romney!
Anonymous| 11.4.08 @ 4:10PM
A vote for Barr is a vote for Barr, regardless of what WendyG has
to say about it.
A vote for Obama is a vote for Obama, and a vote for Barr is a
vote for Barr no matter how you spin it.
The process is supposedly democratic. If you can't vote for who
you want to, then stay home. Which is what I would have done were
Barr not on the ballot.
Congratulations on your Barr vote.
se7en| 11.4.08 @ 4:30PM
Jaxon,
I don't understand why a libertarian like yourself would
"possibly" vote for Huckabee, "but never Romney."
Huckabee is a populist, who kept attacking Romney for his
free-market beliefs, saying Romney was someone who laid people
off his whole life.
A libertarian for Huckabee? You have got to be down-right crazy.
Romney is a lot more LIBERTARIAN when it comes to the economy
than Huckabee!
Dan| 11.5.08 @ 5:30AM
tjoseph,
Due to our electoral college system, you can't always vote for
who you want to.
TE| 11.4.08 @ 12:45PM
I don't really see how you could go from the Bush-twin Romney to Barr - but I'm glad you did. I'm a FairTax junkie, so it was naturally for me to go from Huckabee to Barr. I live in Arizona and see first hand how McCain is clueless to what is going on in his own state - which shows you how clueless he would be as President.
You voted for Barr on principle - you are never wasting your vote when you vote on principle. The accusation that it would be a wasted vote would be just plain offensive.
se7en| 11.4.08 @ 1:06PM
TE,
I completely reject your naive notion that Romney is a "Bush-twin."
It figures you were a Huckabee supporter. Go populism? Huckabee's views on the economy are a disgrace to the Republican party.
WendyG| 11.4.08 @ 1:25PM
With all due respect, a vote for Barr is effectively a vote for Obama, no matter how else you try to spin it.
midge| 11.4.08 @ 1:59PM
i congratulate you for voting on principle. that's what democracy is often about.
as for your daughter, if she didn't want to tell you for whom she voted, and if demographics tell us anything, and if the fact that *you* lean right tells us anything, she voted obama.
Jaxon| 11.4.08 @ 2:31PM
I too don't understand the jump from Romney to Barr. I voted Libertarian for almost every office they were on the ballot for. This is the true party of the people. They are the only party left that still holds the values of which this country was started. And they need to increase their support so more people hear their message.
I would have voted for Ron Paul or possibly Huckabee (he believes in small govt, fair tax), but never Romney!
Anonymous| 11.4.08 @ 4:10PM
A vote for Barr is a vote for Barr, regardless of what WendyG has to say about it.
tjoseph| 11.4.08 @ 4:25PM
A vote for Obama is a vote for Obama, and a vote for Barr is a vote for Barr no matter how you spin it.
The process is supposedly democratic. If you can't vote for who you want to, then stay home. Which is what I would have done were Barr not on the ballot.
Congratulations on your Barr vote.
se7en| 11.4.08 @ 4:30PM
Jaxon,
I don't understand why a libertarian like yourself would "possibly" vote for Huckabee, "but never Romney."
Huckabee is a populist, who kept attacking Romney for his free-market beliefs, saying Romney was someone who laid people off his whole life.
A libertarian for Huckabee? You have got to be down-right crazy. Romney is a lot more LIBERTARIAN when it comes to the economy than Huckabee!
Dan| 11.5.08 @ 5:30AM
tjoseph,
Due to our electoral college system, you can't always vote for who you want to.