On the main site, we posted an article I wrote for the October
print edition about progressive activists meeting in Denver
during the Democratic convention. Their aim is to make sure
Obama, if elected, governs as a transformational liberal in the
tradition of LBJ and FDR. I wrote:
For all their optimism, it's worth pointing out that there are
substantial differences between now and the other periods of
transformational change in American political history. Both LBJ
and FDR assumed office during times when the climate was far
more suited for sweeping changes. Progressives can do all the
talking they want about how the economy is in a state of severe
crisis, but empirically, our current economic problems pale in
comparison to what they were when FDR was elected in 1932. That
year, the nation's economy shrunk by more than 13 percent and
the unemployment rate was 23.6; by contrast, the economy grew
3.3 percent in this year's second quarter, while as of July the
unemployment rate was 5.7. LBJ assumed office in the wake of
the tragic assassination of the beloved John F. Kennedy and the
outpouring of sympathy made it a lot easier for his successor
to push legislation through Congress -- and it didn't hurt that
at one point Democrats had 68 Senators.
A few weeks after I wrote this, the financial collapse ensued,
and so now Democrats would have a crisis that can be used to
justify a massive expansion of government along the lines of the
Great Society and New Deal. Should Obama get elected with an
effectively filibuster-proof Senate, the key question now is
whether Democrats will be able to exploit the crisis to push
initiatives such as universal health care, or whether the massive
budgetary hole we're in as a result of the bailout, plus
declining tax revenues as the economy shrinks, will tie their
hands. Remember that prior to FDR, there weren't any major
entitlements, and prior to LBJ, there was no Medicare or
Medicaid, so there was room for the government to grow. That is
no longer the case.
Either way, I think my conclusion still holds:
The biggest mistake progressives are making is to believe that
the diminished prospects for the Republican Party this November
mean that the conservative movement itself has been vanquished.
But regardless of who wins this election, the network of
conservative media, policy organizations, and activist groups
will still be in a much stronger position to resist radical
liberal reforms than their predecessors in the earlier eras of
transformational progressive change.
In total agreement Mr. Klein. Obviously the first barrage of many
battles directed at Conservatives is the Fairness Doctrine. The
Left-wing nut jobs in Obamanation will seek with voracity all
avenues to put the "Hush on Rush", just to name one. Undoubtably
there will be more journalists " thrown under the bus or off the
plane". It is only the beginning of negative expectation of the
civil battles we all face.
Grissie| 11.3.08 @ 12:05PM
In total agreement Mr. Klein. Obviously the first barrage of many battles directed at Conservatives is the Fairness Doctrine. The Left-wing nut jobs in Obamanation will seek with voracity all avenues to put the "Hush on Rush", just to name one. Undoubtably there will be more journalists " thrown under the bus or off the plane". It is only the beginning of negative expectation of the civil battles we all face.