Second Amendment historian Clayton Cramer (author of Armed America, the definitive refutation of academic
fraud Michael Bellesiles),
examines the attacks on Sarah Palin and suggests that liberal
attacks stem mainly from two causes:
1. She's a pro-life, evangelical Christian.
2. She's a woman.
To the left, it is axiomatic that every woman has to be
pro-choice and hostile to the patriarchial system of oppression
that is Christianity.
I do think Stacy is on to something here: when the people that
played a major part in the Iraq strategy suggest that Palin was
an incredibly bad choice -- consider the source.
My point was not to say that all hawks are disqualified from
criticizing Palin. What I objected to was the "expert" assertion
that Palin is (a) the basic cause of Republican electoral
difficulties and/or (b) somehow symptomatic of a fundamental
problem with the conservative movement.
This is scapegoating pure and simple, and its sources are among
those who far more deserve to be thus blamed than the governor of
Alaska. Her son is fighting the war the "experts" demanded,
and the lady's reward is to be vilely insulted by them?
Just to think of this injustice makes my blood boil.
If this were 1850, they would be invited to meet
me in Bladensburg, the miserable curs!
Mac, it's funny how Gov. Palin is getting hit from within but
Biden is not. Biden is so bad that they are finding a place for
him to hide while Gov. Palin is drawing crowds of 20,000+.
M. Tobias| 11.1.08 @ 10:48AM
There is undoubtedly some gender discrimination involved among
Republican critics of Sarah Palin. But this is by no means the
true reason for their dismay. It was evident, even before the
convention, that John McCain had no chance of winning by
appealing to independents and moderate Democrats and ignoring
conservative Republicans. Hence, the choice of a pro-life,
pro-second amendment, evangelical Christian, fiscally responsible
woman as his VP, instead of Joe Leiberman. This woman represents
everything that the country club Republican set fears. The rise
to prominence of the common conservative. They are deathly afraid
of a Palin Presidency in 2012, and it shows in their attacks.
Michael Roush| 11.1.08 @ 12:14PM
Sounds like country club Republicans and moderate Democrats share
a lot of common ground.
M. Tobias| 11.1.08 @ 12:24PM
That they do, Michael. Fortunately, 60% of Americans are
self-described conservatives. But, don't be frightened.
Conservatives are a tolerant lot.
Just think back to 96 when Buchanan had some success and how many
so called conservatives said they would NOT back him if
nominated. Truth is, they claim to worship Reagan but they would
rather be in charge of the Republican party or Conservative
Movement than be second fiddle on the winning team.
M. Tobias| 11.1.08 @ 1:26PM
Conservatives are not a homogeneous block of voters. And there is
no real leadership of Conservatives, contrary to what you may
have heard. Conservatives are simply common people who have
certain common beliefs and views.
In the case of Pat Buchanan, may of his viewpoints resonated
strongly with conservatives. What diminished his chances with
voters in '96 were two things. One was a report of close ties
between a white supremist group and one of Buchanan's advisers
[it was never proven] and Buchanan's extreme isolationism. But,
it was the leadership of the Republican Party [those old country
club Republicans] that killed his run. The primary schedule is
structured in such a way as to give the Party a large degree of
control over the selection of the nominee. It is all about power,
acquiring it and holding it. Those that have it within the
Republican Party, understandably, do not wish to give it up.
Captain America| 11.1.08 @ 1:50AM
Mac, it's funny how Gov. Palin is getting hit from within but Biden is not. Biden is so bad that they are finding a place for him to hide while Gov. Palin is drawing crowds of 20,000+.
M. Tobias| 11.1.08 @ 10:48AM
There is undoubtedly some gender discrimination involved among Republican critics of Sarah Palin. But this is by no means the true reason for their dismay. It was evident, even before the convention, that John McCain had no chance of winning by appealing to independents and moderate Democrats and ignoring conservative Republicans. Hence, the choice of a pro-life, pro-second amendment, evangelical Christian, fiscally responsible woman as his VP, instead of Joe Leiberman. This woman represents everything that the country club Republican set fears. The rise to prominence of the common conservative. They are deathly afraid of a Palin Presidency in 2012, and it shows in their attacks.
Michael Roush| 11.1.08 @ 12:14PM
Sounds like country club Republicans and moderate Democrats share a lot of common ground.
M. Tobias| 11.1.08 @ 12:24PM
That they do, Michael. Fortunately, 60% of Americans are self-described conservatives. But, don't be frightened. Conservatives are a tolerant lot.
Kingfish| 11.1.08 @ 12:42PM
Just think back to 96 when Buchanan had some success and how many so called conservatives said they would NOT back him if nominated. Truth is, they claim to worship Reagan but they would rather be in charge of the Republican party or Conservative Movement than be second fiddle on the winning team.
M. Tobias| 11.1.08 @ 1:26PM
Conservatives are not a homogeneous block of voters. And there is no real leadership of Conservatives, contrary to what you may have heard. Conservatives are simply common people who have certain common beliefs and views.
In the case of Pat Buchanan, may of his viewpoints resonated strongly with conservatives. What diminished his chances with voters in '96 were two things. One was a report of close ties between a white supremist group and one of Buchanan's advisers [it was never proven] and Buchanan's extreme isolationism. But, it was the leadership of the Republican Party [those old country club Republicans] that killed his run. The primary schedule is structured in such a way as to give the Party a large degree of control over the selection of the nominee. It is all about power, acquiring it and holding it. Those that have it within the Republican Party, understandably, do not wish to give it up.