It has been interesting to observe the public debate over Barack
Obama's associations with individuals whose personal histories
can only be categorized as radical. Bill Ayers is a former
terrorist. Jeremiah Wright preaches race
adversarialism. For the most part, Obama's friendships with
these men has been water off a duck's back for the electorate.
Imagine a different scenario. There is an evangelical
candidate. He is the best evangelical candidate ever.
A Rhodes Scholar, a distinguished lawyer who has argued before
the Supreme Court, astoundingly eloquent, you get the idea.
This candidate is a conservative, but answers all questions in
such a way as to avoid making anyone uncomfortable. He hits
all the right chords.
Further imagine that the record shows this man was once heavily
involved with Christian reconstructionists who believe stoning
should be re-instituted for adultery. He went to a church
for two decades where a Christian reconstructionist preached each
Sunday. One of his mentors was part of a group that bombed
abortion clinics.
Where would that candidate be right now? And how different
would that candidate be in terms of associations from one Barack
Obama?
topics:
Barack Obama