-
What Obama Should Have Done During Subsequent Debates
October 29, 2012 | 6 comments
-
Just Another Casual Conversation About Voter Fraud
October 26, 2012 | 0 comments
-
CNN: Obama’s plan not “significantly new,” just same old stuff repackaged
October 23, 2012 | 6 comments
-
Acts of Terror, etc.
October 16, 2012 | 15 comments
-
Devastating RNC ad captures Biden laughing at the issues
October 11, 2012 | 9 comments
The Spectacle Blog
I don’t know why RSM is so insistant on bringing up Ross Douthat’s Harvard credentials, since they don’t speak to anything anymore than my lower-tier ivy credentials might. They’re irrelevant to his argument, which is summarized as follows: Senator McCain’s loss should not necessarily be construed as a failure of moderate Republicanism (though Rush is saying it is). Instead, it’s a failure of strategy, given its substance-free approach.
Ross’s assessment omits this point. The substance-free approach of McCain and Co. is absolutely tied to moderate Republicanism and the campaign’s strategic failure. McCain’s lackluster response to the economic crisis is a perfect example of this. His aversion to addressing issues was rooted in lacking a coherent philosophy as the thread to weave through it. What was it the press and conservatives have been howling about for months? The lack of a message. Wouldn’t that message have been solidified if McCain ran on simply more than “I was for the surge before anyone else was?”
Yet that’s what moderate Republicanism offers. It offers a few issues where their expertise might be attractive to independents. In this game, however, a Democrat always wins. Why? Because a Democrat can argue about the need for moderation as a way to shortcircuit concern about going too far with spending. No one in the party will call the candidate on his ambition. A moderate Republican, however, has to contend with a party base that’s a little more discerning.
Rush’s point was that true conservatism — a belief in the right to life, a strong national defense, and limited government, resonates in a way that does not happen with watered-down self-servatism, because the latter is too difficult to effectively communicate in a way that resonates with independents and core conservatives. The point is that you can reach independents using a conservative message. When you try to simply cater your message to independents, though, it makes little sense — because independents themselves have a philosophy that doesn’t quite make sense (otherwise, more people would be attracted to it, right?).
Ran Hay, a commenter on Stacy’s earlier post, puts it fantastically well: “Even ‘moderates’ and ‘undecideds’ pine for clear choices.”
View all comments (1) | Leave a comment
More Blog Posts by J.P. Freire
http://spectator.org/blog/2008/10/26/self-servatism-isnt-going-to-w
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
H/T to National Review Online
ADVERTISEMENT
Robert Stacy McCain | 10.27.08 @ 10:12AM
J.P., political rhetoric serves an educational function. One of the mistakes that "cradle conservatives" make is to assume that ordinary Americans are already familiar with the basic arguments for limited government, free enterprise, etc. Assuming that people have already heard these arguments, which seem so self-evident to conservatives, Republican officials don't ever bother to outline the case for limited government in speeches and debates.
Think about it. When was the last time you heard a GOP official name-check Hayek or invoke the Federalist Papers?
Ronald Reagan -- and Newt Gingrich, in his heyday -- did not make that mistake. They constantly reiterated the case for constitutional government and economic liberty. In Reagan was very good at making that case in terms that anyone could understand, as in his famous 1964 speech: "We have so many people who can't see a fat man standing beside a thin one without coming to the conclusion the fat man got that way by taking advantage of the thin one." Or, as he said on many occasions, "No poor man ever gave me a job."
Rush Limbaugh has been making those arguments, day in, day out, for 20 years. When people who call themselves "conservatives" start engaging in contradictory rhetoric -- as when John McCain slams "Wall Street greed" -- it muddies the message and inflicts brand damage, and that makes Rush angry. It's like my conservative Catholic friends who become enraged at the rhetoric of oxymoronic "pro-choice Catholics."
Ross Douthat wants a "conservatism" that is similar in function and content to liberalism, an activist-government agenda that offers programs and policies designed to secure the votes of specific voter blocs. In other words, Republicans engaging in an electoral bidding war with Democrats, an auction they are sure to lose. This is exactly the "me-too" Republicanism that Goldwater and Reagan and Gingrich rejected. The task of conservatives is to advocate an alternative worldview, a conception of independent citizenship and limited government. To the extent that John McCain has failed to articulate that message, or indeed articulated an opposite message, his electoral shortcomings cannot be attributed to a failure of conservatism.