The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Why not? Perhaps lots of undecideds are moving into McCain's column, but they're concentrated in red states, while meanwhile somewhat fewer undecideds are moving into Obama's column, but they're concentrated in battleground states. Since the battleground states are where Obama is campaigning, this doesn't seem crazy to me.

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

W. James Antle III| 10.23.08 @ 2:39PM

Because national trends and swing-state trends, especially when we're talking about large swing states, tend not to be completely independent of each other. Because we would really have to be talking about "lots of undecideds" moving toward McCain in red states for him to gain ground nationally while watching double-digit deficits worsen in the battlegrounds. It is more likely that the pollsters have differing assumptions about turnout, voter ID, etc. than that we are seeing almost all the battleground states defy a national trend toward McCain. Unless something big changed while these various polls were being taken.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by John Tabin

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/10/23/re-these-polls-cant-all-be-rig
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT