This is a telling quote from top McCain aide Mark Salter in an interview with Jeffrey Goldberg:
McCain won't even use Rev. Wright, out of an abundance of caution. So he raises the next guy, Bill Ayers, and you know what we get? We get called racist. How is that racist? You got me.
So, McCain was afraid to bring up the Rev Wright issue --though Obama had a close 20 year relationship with him -- and thus decided to spend weeks on the more tenuous Ayers association. I'm still of the opinion that the long primary battle with Hillary Clinton benefited Obama by allowing him to get the Wright issue out of the way months before it could do maximum damage. But the Salter quote is revealing in another way. McCain spent a long time courting his "base" in the media and adapting his behavior to remain in their good graces, but what he's now finding out is what most of us have long known -- that liberal journalists will do their best to portray any Republican in the worst possible light. The only difference this time is that when they criticize the GOP candidate, it's to set up a contrast between the "new McCain" and the "old McCain."
I think the Salter comment also reinforces the mixed message of the McCain campaign, which could be summarized: "I want to run a respectful campaign and reach across party lines, so don't vote for that little socialist schmuck."
"I think the Salter comment also reinforces the mixed message
of
the McCain campaign, which could be summarized: "I want to run
a
respectful campaign and reach across party lines, so don't vote
for
that little socialist schmuck." That, in a nutshell, expresses
why
those of us with a constitutional political orientation find
the
good senator such a bitter pill to swallow. After all, for
what
reason should he be trusted to oppose the socialist forces
in
American government, given his long-standing propensity to
cooperate with them and co-sponsor their legislation? Swallow him
I
shall, though, for a bitter pill is preferable to a main course
of
Trojan horse.
sharon| 11.1.08 @ 11:34PM
I voted for McCain but could not understand why he would
purposley leave out Rev. Wright affiliations with Obama. Now I
have read the blogs and feel sucker punched. I now see McCain as
a timid, frightened candidate, and if he is this afraid now, what
happens if he becomes president and someone scares him? No, not
good qualities for a person to run a country. What a waste of my
time and vote. I am no Obama fan but if he is more courageous
than the "Maverick" maybe he deserves to win. Time for McCain to
call it quits and go home to bed(with the night light on)
Thomas| 10.21.08 @ 8:46AM
"I think the Salter comment also reinforces the mixed message of the McCain campaign, which could be summarized: "I want to run a respectful campaign and reach across party lines, so don't vote for that little socialist schmuck." That, in a nutshell, expresses why those of us with a constitutional political orientation find the good senator such a bitter pill to swallow. After all, for what reason should he be trusted to oppose the socialist forces in American government, given his long-standing propensity to cooperate with them and co-sponsor their legislation? Swallow him I shall, though, for a bitter pill is preferable to a main course of Trojan horse.
sharon| 11.1.08 @ 11:34PM
I voted for McCain but could not understand why he would purposley leave out Rev. Wright affiliations with Obama. Now I have read the blogs and feel sucker punched. I now see McCain as a timid, frightened candidate, and if he is this afraid now, what happens if he becomes president and someone scares him? No, not good qualities for a person to run a country. What a waste of my time and vote. I am no Obama fan but if he is more courageous than the "Maverick" maybe he deserves to win. Time for McCain to call it quits and go home to bed(with the night light on)