Jennifer Rubin is right: The Obama campaign is using thuggish tactics to literally try to stifle opposition (who cares about free speech, anyhow?) while they try to steal the election. Yes, I repeat: The Obama people are trying to steal the election through the most massive voter fraud this country has ever seen. So now what are the thuggish Obama lawyers going to do: Ask that I, too, be prosecuted? Have at me. Come get me, you radical Alinskyite subverters of the republic. Come get me.
Mr. Hillyer,
You're hyperventilating. Please, take a seat, place your head
between your knees and breathe deeply. When you gain your
equilibrium, pour yourself a nice scotch, or whatever libation
you prefer, and try to relax. I'm worried about you, old boy.
ruth| 10.19.08 @ 1:26AM
oh, no. i think i smell that snotty liberal .
Ned| 10.19.08 @ 11:12AM
"Mr. Hillyer,
You’re hyperventilating. Please, take a seat, place your head
between your knees and breathe deeply. When you gain your
equilibrium, pour yourself a nice scotch, or whatever libation
you prefer, and try to relax. I’m worried about you, old boy."
So worried that we will soon be sending people like you to
re-education camps. Government funded, of course, and as Senator
Kerry says, "They ain't so bad."
Michael Roush| 10.19.08 @ 12:20PM
Ned,
Ignoring the absurdity of your premise about re-education camps,
why would I be sent to one? According to you, people like me
would presumably be setting them up for people like you. You have
consumed so much wing-nut propaganda that it has overwhelmed your
ability to think logically.
Ned| 10.19.08 @ 2:12PM
I was pretending to be you and giving some more fatherly advice
to Mr. Hillyer. Just having a little fun on Sunday morning,
understand, old boy.
Oliver| 10.19.08 @ 4:23PM
Urgh. So many... Republican... talking points. I think I just
threw up in my mouth... a little.
Putting aside the hilarity of casting the Democrats as an
anti-free speech party, you can read all about the voter fraud
issue/non-issue in that crazy radical fringe magazine, Slate:
http://www.slate.com/id/2202428/
There has only been one documented case of voter fraud since
2002... that's for either side. Why is voter fraud a non-issue?
Because no one is going to show up at a polling center with a
fake I.D. and risk going to jail in order to cast a SINGLE vote
for Obama (or McCain, as the case may be). Even supposing that
this hypothetical non-person risked being arrested, say, five
times in a single day by casting, say, five fake votes for Obama
(which would be almost impossible to do, as the risk of getting
catch would rise exponentially), that would still be only FIVE
votes for Obama... requiring five fake registrations, five fake
I.D.s, and the very certain prospect of jail time. It's just not
going to happen.
Fret not, voter fraud is a non-issue. You guys can start
obsessing about other stuff now.
And speaking of freedom of speech, it might be nice if The
Spectator stopped referring to liberal posters as "trolls," as
you guys have done in your previous blogs. I'm no troll, and
certainly am not a paid troll. I'm a normal human being who reads
both liberal and conservative websites in order to find out what
both sides are saying. ...That's okay with you guys, right?
Ned| 10.19.08 @ 5:29PM
"Putting aside the hilarity of casting the Democrats as an
anti-free speech party, "
Oliver, did you see the video of the McCain Palin folks walking
through Manhattan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQalRPQ8stI
Doesn't look like halarity to me.
Oliver| 10.19.08 @ 6:44PM
Okay, I watched it. Gracious! The fearsome Upper West Side of
Manhattan! Those marchers are lucky they didn't get latteed or
arugulaed to death.
This is, I guess, part of the new trend of extrapolating what
each party stands for based on the behavior of individual voters.
If we want to play that game... no, I don't even what to play
that game. But using that logic, we can extrapolate from
McCain/Palin events that the Republican party, as a whole, wants
to kill Obama based on what a couple of dudes shouted.
But no, we can't do that. People being jerks on the Upper West
Side doesn't make the Democratic party the anti-free speech
party. And I wouldn't call the Republicans the anti-free speech
party either.
Y'all need to chill out. It's an election. McCain's probably
going to lose. Deal. Stop accusing the Democrats of being evil
vote-faking Stalinists. That just ain't Kosher, y'all.
I live in Louisiana, and I have a feeling that an Obama march
through certain, um, more rural sections of the state wouldn't be
greeted, um, totally joyously. That's life. People are jerks.
That sucks. But drawing false conclusions based on that is even
suckier.
Joe| 10.19.08 @ 7:36PM
Oliver, I have to say, as much as I disagree with you (I'm a
Republican from Texas), you are right-on point. I'm voting McCain
and hope everyone does. But, geez, guys, it is an election, and
one we're going to lose. Who cares? Someone's got to lose!
Someone's got to win! We've done it before. And we'll do it
again. So let's build our party back the way we want it, the way
the Dems did since 2001. They deserve to win now. And we'll
deserve to win then. Watch out for that swinging pendulum...
Every time one of you weak-in-the-head clowns says "We're gonna
lose," some weak-in-the-knees lad or lass listens to you and just
gives up and decides to stay home and not bother to vote. That's
what OhBummer wants his opposition to do. Is that what you want
his opposition to do? Damn you. Get off your duffs and get your
teeth into the ACORN fraud or any other hefty hunk of steaming
junk that OhBummer's gang is pooping on us!
Michael Roush| 10.19.08 @ 10:34PM
Osama Pajamas? Please!!! Quin and I sign our full names. Everyone
else at least owns up to their first name. Come on. Stand up for
what you believe and sign your submissions.
Ned, well done. I will be paying very close attention to your
postings in the future. You nailed me in a most exquisite way.
Good work, old boy
Shaylo| 10.20.08 @ 2:06AM
Americans needs to wake up. The Obama movement is larger than
anyone can fathom.
It doesn't make sense on ANY level.
"VOTE YOUR GUT"
I pray we are not THAT far out of touch with good and evil, right
and wrong.
Ned| 10.20.08 @ 10:40AM
Michael Roush, Thank you and have a good day.
Oliver, Either side has the potential to take away rights, and
there are many ways to do it. It starts in little steps, as in
the upper west side or politically correct speech enforcements on
college campuses.
As far as the McCain Palin rally and the folks yelling kill
Obama, I agree this would be deplorable behavior. The trouble is
no one other than the reporter who wrote of it heard it. I under
stand the secret service guys didn't hear it either.
But, who knows.
Oliver| 10.20.08 @ 12:11PM
Yawn. Dude, watch the videos of the rallies. Don't waste my
time
with this silliness. You can hear people shouting "Terrorist!"
and
"Kill him!" Not that that was my main point. You don't have to
try
to spin everything your way, you know. It destroys
credibility.
"Politically correct speech enforcements on college
campuses"?
Please. Wasn't that a big issue for like 5 minutes, in like,
1990?
I'm in college right now; I haven't noticed any "speech
enforcements." Stop cherry-picking data, and start being
honest
with yourself. This election is going to end (even though it
seems
like it's being going on for fifteen years), and even when
it's
over, we'll still have to all deal with each other and get
along.
So let's all suck it up and get a grip.
Mary| 10.20.08 @ 6:41PM
Bravo, Quinn!! As for me, I'm already setting up anonymous
email
accounts around the world so I'll be a lot harder to find.
Michael Roush| 10.18.08 @ 6:12PM
Mr. Hillyer, You're hyperventilating. Please, take a seat, place your head between your knees and breathe deeply. When you gain your equilibrium, pour yourself a nice scotch, or whatever libation you prefer, and try to relax. I'm worried about you, old boy.
ruth| 10.19.08 @ 1:26AM
oh, no. i think i smell that snotty liberal .
Ned| 10.19.08 @ 11:12AM
"Mr. Hillyer, You’re hyperventilating. Please, take a seat, place your head between your knees and breathe deeply. When you gain your equilibrium, pour yourself a nice scotch, or whatever libation you prefer, and try to relax. I’m worried about you, old boy."
So worried that we will soon be sending people like you to re-education camps. Government funded, of course, and as Senator Kerry says, "They ain't so bad."
Michael Roush| 10.19.08 @ 12:20PM
Ned, Ignoring the absurdity of your premise about re-education camps, why would I be sent to one? According to you, people like me would presumably be setting them up for people like you. You have consumed so much wing-nut propaganda that it has overwhelmed your ability to think logically.
Ned| 10.19.08 @ 2:12PM
I was pretending to be you and giving some more fatherly advice to Mr. Hillyer. Just having a little fun on Sunday morning, understand, old boy.
Oliver| 10.19.08 @ 4:23PM
Urgh. So many... Republican... talking points. I think I just threw up in my mouth... a little.
Putting aside the hilarity of casting the Democrats as an anti-free speech party, you can read all about the voter fraud issue/non-issue in that crazy radical fringe magazine, Slate: http://www.slate.com/id/2202428/
There has only been one documented case of voter fraud since 2002... that's for either side. Why is voter fraud a non-issue? Because no one is going to show up at a polling center with a fake I.D. and risk going to jail in order to cast a SINGLE vote for Obama (or McCain, as the case may be). Even supposing that this hypothetical non-person risked being arrested, say, five times in a single day by casting, say, five fake votes for Obama (which would be almost impossible to do, as the risk of getting catch would rise exponentially), that would still be only FIVE votes for Obama... requiring five fake registrations, five fake I.D.s, and the very certain prospect of jail time. It's just not going to happen.
Fret not, voter fraud is a non-issue. You guys can start obsessing about other stuff now.
And speaking of freedom of speech, it might be nice if The Spectator stopped referring to liberal posters as "trolls," as you guys have done in your previous blogs. I'm no troll, and certainly am not a paid troll. I'm a normal human being who reads both liberal and conservative websites in order to find out what both sides are saying. ...That's okay with you guys, right?
Ned| 10.19.08 @ 5:29PM
"Putting aside the hilarity of casting the Democrats as an anti-free speech party, "
Oliver, did you see the video of the McCain Palin folks walking through Manhattan. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQalRPQ8stI
Doesn't look like halarity to me.
Oliver| 10.19.08 @ 6:44PM
Okay, I watched it. Gracious! The fearsome Upper West Side of Manhattan! Those marchers are lucky they didn't get latteed or arugulaed to death.
This is, I guess, part of the new trend of extrapolating what each party stands for based on the behavior of individual voters. If we want to play that game... no, I don't even what to play that game. But using that logic, we can extrapolate from McCain/Palin events that the Republican party, as a whole, wants to kill Obama based on what a couple of dudes shouted.
But no, we can't do that. People being jerks on the Upper West Side doesn't make the Democratic party the anti-free speech party. And I wouldn't call the Republicans the anti-free speech party either.
Y'all need to chill out. It's an election. McCain's probably going to lose. Deal. Stop accusing the Democrats of being evil vote-faking Stalinists. That just ain't Kosher, y'all.
I live in Louisiana, and I have a feeling that an Obama march through certain, um, more rural sections of the state wouldn't be greeted, um, totally joyously. That's life. People are jerks. That sucks. But drawing false conclusions based on that is even suckier.
Joe| 10.19.08 @ 7:36PM
Oliver, I have to say, as much as I disagree with you (I'm a Republican from Texas), you are right-on point. I'm voting McCain and hope everyone does. But, geez, guys, it is an election, and one we're going to lose. Who cares? Someone's got to lose! Someone's got to win! We've done it before. And we'll do it again. So let's build our party back the way we want it, the way the Dems did since 2001. They deserve to win now. And we'll deserve to win then. Watch out for that swinging pendulum...
Osamas Pajamas| 10.19.08 @ 9:12PM
Every time one of you weak-in-the-head clowns says "We're gonna lose," some weak-in-the-knees lad or lass listens to you and just gives up and decides to stay home and not bother to vote. That's what OhBummer wants his opposition to do. Is that what you want his opposition to do? Damn you. Get off your duffs and get your teeth into the ACORN fraud or any other hefty hunk of steaming junk that OhBummer's gang is pooping on us!
Michael Roush| 10.19.08 @ 10:34PM
Osama Pajamas? Please!!! Quin and I sign our full names. Everyone else at least owns up to their first name. Come on. Stand up for what you believe and sign your submissions. Ned, well done. I will be paying very close attention to your postings in the future. You nailed me in a most exquisite way. Good work, old boy
Shaylo| 10.20.08 @ 2:06AM
Americans needs to wake up. The Obama movement is larger than anyone can fathom. It doesn't make sense on ANY level.
"VOTE YOUR GUT"
I pray we are not THAT far out of touch with good and evil, right and wrong.
Ned| 10.20.08 @ 10:40AM
Michael Roush, Thank you and have a good day.
Oliver, Either side has the potential to take away rights, and there are many ways to do it. It starts in little steps, as in the upper west side or politically correct speech enforcements on college campuses. As far as the McCain Palin rally and the folks yelling kill Obama, I agree this would be deplorable behavior. The trouble is no one other than the reporter who wrote of it heard it. I under stand the secret service guys didn't hear it either. But, who knows.
Oliver| 10.20.08 @ 12:11PM
Yawn. Dude, watch the videos of the rallies. Don't waste my time with this silliness. You can hear people shouting "Terrorist!" and "Kill him!" Not that that was my main point. You don't have to try to spin everything your way, you know. It destroys credibility. "Politically correct speech enforcements on college campuses"? Please. Wasn't that a big issue for like 5 minutes, in like, 1990? I'm in college right now; I haven't noticed any "speech enforcements." Stop cherry-picking data, and start being honest with yourself. This election is going to end (even though it seems like it's being going on for fifteen years), and even when it's over, we'll still have to all deal with each other and get along. So let's all suck it up and get a grip.
Mary| 10.20.08 @ 6:41PM
Bravo, Quinn!! As for me, I'm already setting up anonymous email accounts around the world so I'll be a lot harder to find.