The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Doug Kmiec is at it again, trying to make the pro-life case for Barack Obama. To make this argument, he has to stack the deck heavily in Obama’s favor. Because he judges John McCain unlikely to succeed at overturning Roe v. Wade — an assesment I share — a vote for McCain isn’t necessarily pro-life. But a vote for Obama, who opposes extending legal protection to unborn children in most if not all cases, is permissible because he believes abortion is “a tragic situation” that should occur less frequently. There are plenty of well meaning people who hold the position that abortion is regrettable but should be permissible, a necessary evil. But that position is not pro-life.

No, Kmiec argues, Obama would actually try to reduce abortions through aid to pregnant mothers, sex education, adoption services, and other mechanisms aimed at reducing unintended pregnancies and making it more feasible to bring crisis pregnancies to term. All McCain would do is repeat Republican promises to overturn Roe, an “effort [that] has not saved a single child,” according to Kmiec. But Roe isn’t the only issue in play here. Obama has said he would sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which invalidate state abortion restrictions that have reduced abortion rates. McCain would veto such legislation. Obama supports taxpayer funding of abortion while McCain favor the Hyde Amendment, which advocates on both sides of the issue believe has prevented many abortions.

In short, there is no clear evidence that anything Obama is proposing would reduce abortions and some reason to believe his policies, if enacted, would increase them. Kmiec even suggests in his penultimate paragraph that legal protection for the unborn should be negotiable. Issues of war and peace might provide proportionate reasons for Catholics and other pro-lifers to vote against McCain (though I think Obama’s about as likely to please such voters as McCain is to overturn Roe). But Kmiec’s odd pro-life case for being pro-choice, as Ramesh Ponnuru puts it, doesn’t do the job.

topics:
Election 2008, John McCain, Barack Obama, Abortion

View all comments (7) |

Mrs. Jackson| 10.17.08 @ 2:03PM

Real simple. As with taxes, Obama's voting record is he's never met an abortion he did not support.

Though the truth is, had he been conceived after 1973, he may not have come into being.

Steven Ertelt | 10.17.08 @ 4:16PM

Douglas Kmiec has been repeatedly exposed for misrepresenting Obama's pro-abortion record. See http://www.lifenews.com/nat3978.html

SAZMD| 10.18.08 @ 4:44PM

I wouldn't agree that efforts to overturn Roe have not saved a single child. Even though conservative appointees have failed so far, they have allowed increasing restrictions on abortion over the years, which have arguably saved lives.

pigment Red | 4.5.10 @ 10:01PM

pigment Red
czmaxpct@gmail.com

Although Obama has run his campaign Organic Pigmentsalmost completely as a to the administration of one George Ink Pigments the parallels between their campaigns are apparent.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/10/17/professional-pro-lifer-for-oba

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

Lerner's Plea

Ray V. Hartwell | 5.23.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

Laying Down My Pen

Quin Hillyer | 5.23.13

ADVERTISEMENT