The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

We're All Racists Now

Conor Friedersdorf at Culture11:

When the McCain campaign vaguely notes that Barack Obama has "ties to unrepentant terrorists," it purposefully muddies the distinction between a leftist radical who bombed government buildings as a young man in the Vietnam era and a suicidal death cult that today threatens our very way of life.

This isn't to say that the long ago deeds of Bill Ayres aren't despicable, or that having failed to repent he should be accepted into polite society. Insofar as Barack Obama abetted Ayres' social standing, criticizing Obama is fair. But the McCain campaign has exploited the fact that Bill Ayres was a terrorist to imply that their opponent is sympathetic to our enemies in the War on Terror, a campaign tactic so irresponsible that even GOP partisans should forcefully denounce it, and for a reason that hasn't anything to do with fairness.

That's a strawman. This argument doesn't say Obama is sympathetic to terrorists. It says that Obama is either a bad judge of character and fairly naive about terrorism, or so politically ambitious that he doesn't care who he associates with in order to rise in his career.

Obama's campaign has hit John McCain for the lobbyists on his campaign staff, including Aquiles Suarez from Fannie Mae. They bring this up because they feel it makes McCain look unserious about reform. Barack Obama, however, says he's calling for a new sort of moderated politics. Yet Jeremiah Wright, his spiritual mentor, has been a radical the entire time Obama has known him. Obama says he wants to fight corruption, yet the organization he used to work with has been historically incapable of going through an election without engaging in voter fraud. And then, Obama says he's serious about fighting terror, and he pretends as though a relationship with an unrepentant homegrown terrorist doesn't smudge that promise.

Conor goes on:

The conventional case against the McCain campaign's tactics is that they stoke the most dangerous impulses of certain anti-Obama partisans. A black contender for the presidency cannot help but make us subconsciously fearful of an assassination attempt. The YouTube clips of McCain/Palin rallies, where mere mention of Obama's name provokes cries of "kill him," "terrorist," and "treason," make those fears conscious.

What?! This meme is popping up everywhere, that John McCain has inadvertantly opened the Pandora's box of racism, and Barack Obama is under threat of assassination on account of it. Or worse, we all become "subconsciously fearful of an assassination attempt." Whatever that means.

I'm subconsciously fearful of a lot of things, I guess, like pâté, or commitment. But John McCain is no more responsible for these fears than he is responsible for the "subconscious racism" Democrats love to fetishize. I'd like to go a single week without being reminded that many people still believe that Obama is a Muslim. They love this anecdote, because it's an opportunity to remind others that the only reason John McCain is popular because Republicans were told to support him at their latest Klan rally.

To support this point, he turns to George Packer:

"It's a big leap from hateful talking points and shouted epithets to vigilantism and the lone gunman," George Packer writes. "What's undeniably true is that Republican rallies and the incendiary language of party leaders are stirring up the darker, destructive mob passions that have a long history in American politics."

This doesn't pass a smell test from a congested squirrel. I've received plenty of emails demonstrating the "darker, destructive mob passions that have a long history in American politics." Strangely, they come from the side of "Hope" and "Change," which are as multicultural as a public school holiday pagaent.

This is what happens with rallies. People get stirred up. They say idiotic things. Look at any small-time blog. The Secret Service deals with this all the time: who's a real threat, versus who wants to simply sound like a threat. Both types get a knock on the door, but we're not swamped with press releases about The Growing Threat of Racist Racism.

It's just another way for Obama supporters to tell us they're really enlightened. Once their man is in office, though, we'll see about that.

Comments

canadian bacon| 10.14.08 @ 2:27PM

Ayers is a lightweight compared to McCain's good friend Liddy. Remember him? Try Google.

Both McCain and Palin have "palled around" with Liddy a hell of a lot more than Obama "palled around" with Ayers.

Liddy is a *convicted terrorist*.

You people are desperate.

Stu| 10.14.08 @ 3:22PM

Uhh, since when does 'palling around with terrorists' not imply that you are sympathetic towards terrorists? Palling around sounds pretty sympathetic to me. And I didn't even need to make that up. Those are the actual words that Palin used. The real strawman is that you intentionally picked a quote that doesn't use the term 'palling around' so that you could argue the wording doesn't imply what the argument is saying. Your argument is completely baseless because the actual words prove that the argument you are trying to discount is actually 100% correct. If no one had actually heard Palin's speech you might be able to get away with garbage arguments like this, but unfortunately for you, everyone knows exactly what she said and thus, exactly how wrong you are.

BOB| 10.14.08 @ 5:38PM

Stu; you are an idoit. Palling around with terrorists does not imply terrorist sympathies.

Palling around with terrorists simply means that you pal around with them.

Do you have any liberal friends, who's ideas of justice and society are laughable, but you hang out with them? Just because you enjoy someone's company doesn't imply you are sympathetic to their cause. BUT it could. If you infer it, you should look to your own prejudice and perceptions.

Further, what is the muddy water between someone who blows up government buildings to terrorize people with whom he disagrees, and someone who blows up other buildings to terrorize people whom he wants to convert or destroy completely. They are both terrorists.

Canadian (Bryon Adams is that you?) Bacon; G. Gordon Liddy was a strange man, a petty thug, and a man of limited intelectual capacity. He was not a terrorist. I am certain he was not convicted of terrorism. I believe your claim that both McCain and Pallin have palled around with the guy to be dubious and unsustantiated.

And Barack, who may very well win the election, is not the guy you think he is.

Me, I've laid in an 8 year supply of food, fuel, and ammo.

I am in doubt there will still be elections or free speech after 8 years of an Obama administration.

All for now, F.B.

Spiderman2| 10.14.08 @ 6:03PM

Hey Bob- Bill Ayers blew up the Pentagon? I wonder why it didn't make the news.... Like Liddy, Ayers, was never convicted of any terrorist act, either. Good job with the false insinuation! (By the way, you look like a typical moron conservative when you write, "you are an idoit.")

BANG| 10.14.08 @ 10:48PM

BANG.... its almost time to play catch the 30.06 bullet with Obama. Both the McCain camp as well as Hillary have mentioned Obama being taken out. Good Riddens !!

Danielle| 10.15.08 @ 6:02PM

The only reason Ayers wasn't convicted was because he got of on a technicality. The FBI did some illegal wiretapping and the case was thrown out. Ayers himself admits openly that he is guilty and still to this day in unrepentant. He stated on 911 that he wishes he had done more (bombing).

Obama did not just pal around with Ayers. Ayers is the founder of the Chicago Annenburg Challenge (CAC). In 1995, Obama was appointed first chairman of CAC.

read more here http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76022

wake up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Chicago school systems have not gotten any better under Ayers leftist , radical programs and our country will not get better either. These are the same types of programs, the same mentality that is going to be used to "change: our country. Change is good, when it's the right kind of change. Obama can keep his kind of change.

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

Glenn Beck on Climategate

Paul Chesser

* * * *

Suicidal Wildlife

Paul Chesser

* * * *

NYT Vs. NYT, Again

Joseph Lawler

* * * *

DeVore, Fiorina Differ on Sotomayor

Brian O'Connell

* * * *

No More Mr. Nice Charlie?

Larry Thornberry

* * * *

The Evening Keynote

Rep. Mike Pence

* * * *

The Girl Who Cried Racism

Christopher Orlet

* * * *

The 12 C's of Climate Alarmism

Paul Chesser

* * * *

So Sioux Me

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Methodist Madame

Mark Tooley

* * * *

Advent Is Coming

Jonathan Aitken

* * * *

Imperial Hypocrisy

Ralph R. Reiland

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT