On the main site, Jim has an important
article about the increasingly grim prospects for the GOP in
Senate races. With each pasing day, it's looking more and more
feasible that Democrats could either gain a literal
filibuster-proof majority of 60, or at least get close enough to
it that it would be effectively filibuster-proof, with the only
bulwark against liberal legislation nominally Republican Senators
such as Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine.
But one thing that may offer a glimmer of hope is that even
though Democrats are poised for another huge victory next month,
by in large, they aren't running as liberals, at least
not at the presidential level, which I've obviously been
following more closely. Barack Obama has spent his entire general
election campaign actually running away from his liberal record,
trying to convince Americans that he's for lower taxes, gun
rights, aggressive pursuit of terrorists (outside of Iraq), a
"net spending cut," and health care that isn't government run.
No doubt that Obama, aided by an even more Democratic Congress,
would try to push liberal legislation, but when the euphoria over
campaign season "change" rhetoric has passed, and Americans
actually see some details, will public outcry help to stymie any
progressive agenda as it did during the Clinton years? Sure, a
lot of bad stuff would get through, but how left can they go
without seriously endangering their prospects in 2010? Remember,
Democratic politicians may be liberal, but they'll always be
politicians first.
UPDATE: A Susan Collins defender has written in to argue that she
gets a bum rap from conservatives, citing Collins's opposition to
the
Farm Bill,
strong opposition to card check legislation, and votes to
confirm Roberts and Alito.
topics:
Taxes, Health Care, Barack Obama, Iraq, NATO