I really am coming to the conclusion that his interest level in the subject matter strongly affects how well he comes across. I don't know exactly WHAT the specific clues are, but I think there must be good body language or other non-verbal cues (intonation also being non-verbal) that he is sending on the foreign policy questions that he just doesn't send on the economic questions.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.