Daniel Larison of The American Conservative
takes issue with my taking issue with the conservative Palin
critics. He feels pretty strongly she's an empty suit (empty
skirt?).
He thought her convention speech was substance-free and her
debate performance was mediocre. I view things a bit differently.
That convention speech was one of the finest political performances
I've ever seen. The line about not seeking the good opinion of the
media/political elite alone was worth the price of admission. And
not just in entertainment value. That was substance. It was about
embracing a different scale of values than those some think are so
dominant as to brook no dissent.
But leave that aside. Sarah Palin has a political record. Let's
forget the ups and downs of her public speaking career and consider
that. Are there conservatives who are going to argue her record is
less than admirable? I don't think it can be done. (No, this is not
a challenge to see whether conservative contrarians can provide
great e-alert material to the Obama camp.)
Palin is still imperfectly seasoned, but I think she's going to
be a transformative political figure in American politics. We'll
have to revisit that question in due time.
topics:
Sarah Palin