McCain just had to show that his experience mattered. He was
successful in doing so. Going into this debate, undecideds likely
wondered: Is Obama's experience an issue? Is McCain too old? Who
will have a sensible foreign policy? What about domestic
policy/economics?
First question, yes, it was, especially now that Kissinger
basically stated the Obama has mischaracterized his views.
Second question, McCain seemed deft, quick-thinking, and wise.
You know, like how we should probably look at older people. He
turned age into an asset tonight.
Third question, McCain by a wash -- Obama suggested an
aggressive-ish foreign policy and echoed McCain on a surprising
number of issues. But, rhetorically speaking, it's hard for anyone
to argue with someone who thinks anything short of victory is
defeat. You have to come up with a number of thoughtful arguments
that convinces that the optimal case is a pullout. Obama's "We'll
save money, though!" point fell completely flat.
Fourth question, Obama and McCain neck and neck. In this area
I'm probably alone to suggest that I think McCain was very strong
here. With a nervous start, he suddenly sprung to life and started
hitting Obama on his own record. Obama said he rescinded his
earmarks. McCain said, "Only when he started his presidential
campaign did he do that." Somebody. Did. His. Homework.
As for whether the Wall Street rant didn't go over well. Who
knows how it went over? Whatever he addressed, he seemed to do so
with authority, particularly on tax cuts, business tax cuts, etc. I
only wish that when Obama said, "You're giving corporation
billions," etc., McCain would have responded, "When you tax
companies, they cut jobs. If you allow them to keep their money,
they do more with it. How does economics work in Chicago?"
Speaking to other DC-right-wingers, many looked a little upset
about how McCain had thrown the most-productive under the bus. I
just don't think doing so hurt him.
topics:
Foreign Policy, Economics, Business, Earmarks
