The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

McCain Mis-cited Ike

John McCain drastically mis-told a story about Dwight Eisenhower during last night's debate. Referring to the famous note Ike wrote as the D-Day invasion was starting in which he took responsibility for failure if it did not succeed, McCain said that Ike had offered to resign if it failed. Wrong. Dead wrong. Yes, Ike took responsibility. But no, he did not offer to resign. Here is the text of the note: "Our landings in the Cherbourg-Havre area have failed to gain a satisfactory foothold and I have withdrawn the troops. My decision to attack at this time and place was based on the best information available. The troops, the air and the Navy did all that bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt it is mine alone."

McCain used his story about Ike's (nonexistent) offer to resign to defend his asinine call last week for SEC Chairman Chris Cox to be fired. His point was that whomever is in charge of a terrible failure should be man enough to take the fall for it. It is a good point -- but a point badly applied. Chris Cox was no more "in charge" of the credit markets (especially Fannie and Feddie) than Ike was in charge of, say, the Iwo Jima landing (if Iwo Jima had gone badly instead of well). But Ike WAS in charge, directly in charge, and clearly the man ultimately responsible for, the D-Day landing in France. Yet even Ike, in his admirable note taking the blame for a potential failure that (thank goodness) did not happen, did not go so far as to resign or offer to do so. How, then, should Cox, whose oversight powers for the credit markets are purely voluntary (voluntary not by him but by the institutions to be overseen) and circumscribed, and whose oversight on Fannie and Freddie was nil, be fired? The parallel would not even have worked even if Ike HAD offered to resign. But the fact that Ike did NOT make such an offer actuallya rgues against McCain's intended point -- and shows McCain to have been reckless in desperately searching for a scapegoat.

topics:
John McCain

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Quin Hillyer

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/09/27/mccain-mis-cited-ike

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

In a Class of His Own

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT