That's a good point, John. Many of the stories actually focus on
the bailout plan, and the "gamble" is not whether he can get out of
the debate, but whether Obama would also participate. That's a
success. I'm trying to read these things with eyes not born of the
beltway -- if I were your average Joe, or an independent, would I
buy that this is a cheap trick?
Talking to Jim earlier, he convinced me that it might be
possible that Obama's "you have to do more than one thing at once"
would go over well. But the news in these stories is that Obama's
continuing his campaign, and McCain's running off to go work on the
legislation. Most of these stories don't show as much of the
cynicism they might have. But that's the thing. The stories are
asking whether Obama's going to make a political calculation about
the debates. Next week, that could probably be a problem for
him.
Look, I'm not trying to be optimistic. As I said, the neutral
headlines had McCain leading the news cycle, and the rest ones were
about McCain pretty much winning it. It might be temporary, but I'm
still not convinced it wasn't a good idea.