By J. Peter Freire on 9.12.08 @ 3:49PM
For some reason, I didn't finish the sentence right. I think she
needs to sit down with some journalism school-trained PR
professionals so that they can give her the going over she needs to
feel confident about this.
Miss Teen South Carolina wasn't a jab at all. Watch the speech
patterns, and listen closely to poor Sarah Palin's sentence
structure. This is what happens in public speaking when someone is
overwhelmed, and it's a classic symptom of stage fright. It's
likely an isolated case, but to prevent it from happening again,
she needs to get more training. She showed grace under pressure
during her convention speech, particularly given that her
teleprompter didn't work and she was touching on her script so
lightly no one noticed. But this is a different format, one she
should be really good at.
Regarding her talent for picking things up: Sure. She has an
aptitude for growth, for acquiring knowledge and owning it -- such
is evidenced by her fast rise as governor. I doubt when she was
running for governor anyone felt she'd be able to command a state
budget and slash it effectively. Yet she did. That takes a certain
amount of deftness. So it would be wrong to suggest she can't
effectively learn to apply her judgement to national security
issues.
That said, it's important to make this distinction.
Conservatives would be in error to suggest Sarah Palin is a strong
national security wonk. She's very clearly not. Instead, they ought
to focus on how people think of the politicians in the executive.
Do we elect experts on issues, or do we elect people with
experience using their judgment on a broad range of issues? Can we
trust Sarah Palin to surround herself with advisers who would
provide her with the clearest picture, where she can then apply her
judgment? In this light, it's much less worrisome.
topics:
Sarah Palin