The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Sarah and Charlie

First of all, who does Charlie Gibson think he is peering down on Sarah Palin through half-lenses? All in all, in part one, she did fine, other than in badly answering a rather trick question on the "Bush Doctrine" -- when's the last time that was in the news? It's not as if Charlie and his colleagues have been spending much time these last several years talking about it. For all inents, it's, if not defunct, in deep freeze.

It was telling that in asking her about Russian and Georgia, Charlie for all intents took the pro-Russian view that somehow Russia was "provoked" into attack Georgia. Palin did okay here, particularly in emphasizing that if Georgia, as a hypothetical member of NATO, were attacked, it would be the moral obligation of the other members of the treaty to come to its help.

topics:
Sarah Palin, Russia, NATO

About the Author

Wlady Pleszczynski is editorial director of The American Spectator and editor-at-large of AmSpec Online.

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/09/11/sarah-and-charlie

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT