The whole first half of Obama’s acceptance speech was standard
stump fare, more suited to a town hall in Ohio than to a prime time
stadium event. I’m not saying he shouldn’t have criticized McCain,
but it seemed strange that he’d devote so much time to his opponent
in this context.
And given that Obama did decide to go on offense, it was really
jarring when he tacked toward a call to post-partisanship. If he
had said much earlier in the speech that he wouldn’t “suggest that
the Senator takes his positions for political purposes” and that
politicians shouldn’t be “challenging each other’s character and
patriotism,” it would been an effective prelude to an attack. It
would still be a bit disingenuous, of course, but the
disingenuousness wouldn’t have been quite so glaring. And if he
held his fire a bit, it wouldn’t have seemed disingenuous at
all.
Pace the mysterious Mr. McWormwood,
though, the speech did have its moments. If taken as a soundbite
rather than as a part of an otherwise very partisan speech, the
we’re-all-patriots passage would qualify. But this, I think, was
the most effective bit:
And Democrats, we must also admit that fulfilling
America’s promise will require more than just money. It will
require a renewed sense of responsibility from each of us to
recover what John F. Kennedy called our “intellectual and moral
strength.” Yes, government must lead on energy independence, but
each of us must do our part to make our homes and businesses more
efficient. Yes, we must provide more ladders to success for young
men who fall into lives of crime and despair. But we must also
admit that programs alone can’t replace parents; that government
can’t turn off the television and make a child do her homework;
that fathers must take more responsibility for providing the love
and guidance their children need.
Individual responsibility and mutual responsibility - that’s the
essence of America’s promise.
That didn’t come until about midway into the speech. I suspect that
those most impressed with Obama were viewers who turned in late.
Lucky for him, people who tune in specifically to catch a speech
like this from the start are more likely to know how they’re going
to vote, so the intersection between undecided voters and people
who missed the beginning of the speech is likely to be significant.