My head is still reeling from last night's speeches, so I want
to see if I have this logic down right: Barack Obama is qualified
to be commander-in-chief because his judgment on foreign policy has
been right and John McCain's wrong. McCain's has been wrong because
he has agreed with the Bush administration while Obama had the
wisdom and foresight to disagree. How do we know that Obama's
vision for foreign policy was right? Because some of his ideas are
now being implemented by the Bush administration.
You don't have to be a fan of the Bush administration's foreign
policy to recognize some twists and turns here.
topics:
Foreign Policy, John McCain, Barack Obama
