DENVER — I’m here at “The Big Tent,” a space a few blocks from the Pepsi Center, where progressives are gathering for panels and speeches througout the convention sponsored by DailyKos and other liberal groups. Right now, Campaign for America’s Future is holding a “Take Back America” panel on the economy.
I’ve written before about whether, if elected, Barack Obama would be a transformative liberal president like FDR, or more of a Bill Clinton — i.e. more concerned with advancing his short term political goals than with advancing any sort of progessive agenda.
Robert Kuttner, co-founder of the American Prospect and author of the new book Obama’s Challenge, argued that all of the transformative presidents in history (he named Lincoln, FDR, and LBJ), started off as moderates and became radicalized once in office as a result of pressure from activists.
“The time for giving [Obama] a pass is over,” Kuttner said. He said Obama needs to understand that to be a great president, he would have to present a much bolder, much more progressive agenda on health care, housing, and deficit spending. He said now that the economy is in bad shape, “we need deficits.” He also called for a “Roosevelt scale” regulation of markets.
Now that Obama will be the Democratic nominee, he said, “it us up to us as progressives” to make sure he adopts a more radical policy agenda.Â
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?