The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Spencer for Liar

Scott Beauchamp says he never fabricated anything, and apparently that's good enough for Spencer Ackerman.

Like everyone who has ever stepped up to defend Beauchamp's work, Ackerman is missing important swaths of the story. He therefore failed to ask Beauchamp a whole lot of important questions when he caught up with him. Do we have to go through this all over again? If so, I really wish this hadn't come up while I'm a) trying to focus on preparatory research for stuff I'm planning to report on in Denver next week and b) really tired. (Acute insomnia last night.) I'll try to pick over some of the problems with Ackerman's article at some point, if I can find the time and energy.

topics:
Energy

About the Author

John Tabin is a frequent contributor to The American Spectator online.

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/08/21/spencer-for-liar

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT