The Spectacle Blog
I just read through Joshua Green’s article on Hillary Clinton’s collapse in the Atlantic, which was based on internal memos and accounts of campaign staff, and a few things struck me.
Though Clinton focused much of her campaign around the claim that she was “ready to lead from day one,” the piece exposes her managerial incompetence and inability to make key decisions or to institute a clear chain of command among her bikering staff. She couldn’t figure out whether she wanted to run a positive campaign that tried to soften her image, or to agressively take down Obama.
Green offers this account of a post-Iowa conference call:
In the hours after she finished third in Iowa, on
January 3, Clinton seized control of her campaign, even as her
advisers continued fighting about whether to go negative. The next
morning’s conference call began with awkward silence, and then Penn
recapped the damage and mumbled something about how badly they’d
been hurt by young voters.
Mustering enthusiasm, Clinton declared that the campaign was
mistaken not to have competed harder for the youth vote and
that-overruling her New Hampshire staff-she would take questions at
town-hall meetings designed to draw comparative,” but not negative,
contrasts with Obama. Hearing little response, Clinton began to
grow angry, according to a participant’s notes. She complained of
being outmaneuvered in Iowa and being painted as the establishment
candidate. The race, she insisted, now had “three front-runners.”
More silence ensued. “This has been a very instructive call,
talking to myself,” she snapped, and hung up.
In the grim days of March, Green writes:
Yet the clashes and paralysis continued. In the
aftermath of Obama’s historic race speech on March 18, Sheila
Jackson Lee, a Texas congresswoman, urged Clinton to deliver a
speech of her own on gender. Clinton appeared very much to want to
do this, and solicited the advice of her staff, which
characteristically split. The campaign went back and forth for
weeks. Opponents argued that her oratory couldn’t possibly match
Obama’s, and proponents countered that she would get credit simply
for trying, inspire legions of women to her cause, and highlight an
issue that everyone in the campaign fiercely believed was hurting
them-sexism. But Clinton never made a decision, and seemed troubled
by the concern of Ann Lewis, perhaps her most venerable feminist
adviser, who opposed such a speech for fear that it would equate
sexism with racism — another contrast with Obama that Clinton
feared she would lose.
In a sense, a lot of this is a useless exercise, because no matter what the strategy she employed, I’m not sure that Clinton could have taken down Obama, given his tremendous political talents and the fact that he was really tapping into what Democrats were feeling in this cycle. His initial opposition to the Iraq War and her vote for the war was just an absolute killer in Iowa. And Obama’s coalition of upper class whites, young voters, and blacks was something we’ve never seen before in Democratic primaries.
With that said, I wonder if Clinton would have been a lot better off had she collapsed earlier, like McCain did last summer. That would have enabled her to refocus her message, adjust her strategy, and reshuffle her staff with plenty of time to recover. As it turned out, by the time the campaign realized she was in trouble, it was too late.
View all comments (3) | Leave a comment
Related Blog Posts
More Blog Posts by Philip Klein
http://spectator.org/blog/2008/08/12/the-clinton-meltdown
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
Current Issue
- The Continuing Crisis
- The Demise of Money and Credit
- A Nation on the Edge
SPONSORED LINKS
FLASHBACK TO: 1995
-
Pope Culture
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
-
Why the GOP Does Not, Like, Totally Suck
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
-
Dames at Sea
-
In the Absence of Guns
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
-
The Metaphysical Martini
-
Counting the Costs of Clintonism
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
-
Chuck McHagel
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
-
The Legacy of Old John and Mother Fresh-Roasted
-
It’s the Best Time of the Year
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
-
The Bush Crack-Up
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Clip of the Day
H/T to National Review Online
ADVERTISEMENT
