I haven't said much about the situation in Georgia, mainly
because I've been reluctant to say anything without reading
closely. Some of Russia's claims about atrocities that may or may
not have been committed by Georgia really would, if true, justify
sending in the tanks to protect South Ossetia, and maybe even
Abkhazia. But
Robert Kagan is right that Putin has been baiting Saakashvili
into a blunder like this for a long time, and now that the Russians
have
gone beyond the breakaway regions and into Georgia proper, the
"Kosovo precendent" excuse clearly doesn't wash. It's clear that
what's going on is that the Kremlin is scratching the same old
expansionist itch that drove Russia policy under both the Soviets
and the Tsars.
So, what do we do about it, beyond the ride home from Iraq that
we've given to Georgian troops? I have no idea.
Ronad Asmus and Richard Holbrooke's invocation of "a vast array
of political, economic and other areas in which Russia's role and
standing will have to be reexamined" is pretty vague; they mention
the Sochi Olympics, but what else do they have in mind?
Bill Kristol calls for "emergency military aid"; what exactly
would that entail?
topics:
Military, Iraq, Russia