- Home
- About Us
- Contributors
- Departments
- Topics
- Back Issues
- Weekly Archives
- AmSpecBlog
- Subscribe
- Newsletter
- Advertise
- Donate
- Contact Us
- Daily Digest
- Templeton Essays
search
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
AmSpecBlog
Expanding government waistlines...
Over at The American Scene, Peter Suderman looks into why it is that politicians are so ineffective at cutting the size of government, particularly when they're people who talk all the time about cutting government:
The fact of the matter is that
most professional advocates who call for drastic reductions in
government aren't in any way attached to the country's various
entitlements and would be glad to cut them substantially. And while
it would be nice to think that politicians might someday match
their actions with their rhetoric, it seems unlikely given the
diversity of the groups they are constantly forced to
please.
He then says:
I think more energy should probably
be devoted by the limited government right to figuring out how to
work within the larger-government framework we seem to be stuck
with for the time being.
I won't abuse that phrase to mean that he thinks all is lost. I'll agree that conservatives need to learn how to subvert the system a bit better. Twenty years prior to their appearance, Reagan or Gingrich's victories would have been unthinkable. But they were based on a realistic notion of making an appeal to voters and spelling things out.
In other words, conservatives haven't done a very good job of
explaining how they want to deal with entitlements. Rep. Paul Ryan
is one of the few people talking about this -- my only question is
why aren't there more? Even within the conservative caucus?
Comments
Leave a Comment
Related Articles
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT