Reading the most recent National Review, I note a weird statement from Mark Krikorian that's striking me as a little (or maybe very) wrongheaded:
In arguing this way, Krikorian gives far too much ground away to "compassionate conservatives" and welfare-loving liberals who point out that the state really does help the poor. People with very little education or few skills can earn enough to support their families, and treating immigrants' desire for social services as inevitable doesn't address the point that part of why they might be so dependent on these services is that they're in this country illegally (and finding work is difficult) or they're priced out of the market by the minimum wage.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
The speech our President should make.
A noted economist fires back.
How political can you get?
You might have missed it, but it was boomed in January.
Farcical feminism is a decades-old phenomenon, as George Will's essay from 1970 reminds us.