Our counterparts over at the Corner seem to have gone all sniffy
over how the John Edwards "love child" story is "tabloid trash,"
even if true. This strikes me as the logical contrapositive ot Dan
Rather's assertion that "the story is true" despite his embrace of
forged documents about George W.'s National Guard service.
In both cases, you can't make something out of nothing. Dan
Rather had a whole lot of nothing. The National Enquirer has a
whole lot of something.
If what the Enquirer has hold of seems trashy, then perhaps John
Edwards ought not to behave that way. As a perpetually public man
who has made professions of devotion to his sick wife, Edwards
deserves the attention, if he has fallen so spectacularly short of
his stated ideals.
Our Corner counterparts ought to be beating their connections
for verification of the story, not getting all delicate about
it.