The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Here's an above the fold, front page headline from the New York Times today: WOMEN ARE NOW EQUAL AS VICTIMS OF POOR ECONOMY.


I thought initially this was a victory--Hey, Raul Castro may have recently declared egalitarianism dead, but not us! Go America!--but, as the article quickly demonstrates, this is actually a hitherto undiscovered strain of bad equality. To our political consultant friends, trust us, Equality of Opportunity...To Fail remains a losing campaign slogan. Or is it?

After moving into virtually every occupation, women are being afflicted on a large scale by the same troubles as men: downturns, layoffs, outsourcing, stagnant wages or the discouraging prospect of an outright pay cut. And they are responding as men have, by dropping out or disappearing for a while.

While losing a job is certainly not the best case scenarios, surely being in the position to be affected by downturns is better than being kept out of those positions during good and bad times, no? And, since this post title provides an opportunity as equal as any other, I've been meaning to post a link to James Poulos' typically outside the box take on Phil Gramm's now (infamous, I guess) pegging of ours as a nation of whiners:

The point is that Americans are whiners, but also sometimes not whiners. They are sometimes whiners about bad actual things they can't affect, and sometimes whiners about stupid things (my gas is going up! It'll cost so much to drive to Starbucks!) but not about much less stupid things (I won't be able to afford heat this winter!). Gramm's rhetoric is so troublesome because it's so falsely polarizing -- in a world where there are two types of people, whiners and nonwhiners, a redress of grievances is impossible, because there are no grievances worthy of the name.

So, yes, my initial glee at Gramm saying the unsayable has been somewhat tempered by the explications of two of my much smarter, well respected colleagues--Jim Antle, being the second--even if, I must admit, it has not yet been extinguished. Maybe it's a personal failing or just a soft spot for free-market orthodoxy espoused by those who resemble melancholy woodland creatures. It's anyone's guess, really.

topics:
Business

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Blog Posts

More Blog Posts by Shawn Macomber

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/07/22/file-under-not-a-mental-recess

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

ADVERTISEMENT