Al Gore's 2000 running mate
Joe Lieberman rips into this year's presumptive nominee:
I wish he would just say that the surge has worked. He
doesn't have to give credit to John McCain or anyone else. He can
give credit to General Petraeus and the troops who have carried it
out. . . . A president's credibility is based on the courage of his
or her convictions, his or her acceptance of reality, and
consistency of views are critical elements of national leadership.
A president who squanders those does so at our nation's peril. . .
.
Sen. Obama said this morning that he wants a foreign policy that is
tough, smart and principled. . . . Was it tough when Sen. Obama
voted to order U.S. troops to retreat from Iraq on a fixed timeline
regardless of the recommendations of our military commanders or
conditions on the ground? Was it smart when Sen. Obama opposed the
surge and predicted that it would fail to improve our security? ...
Was it tough and principled when Sen. Obama said he would be open
to changing his plan on Iraq after going there and talking to
General Petraeus, which I think was the right position, only to
change that position hours later after being heatedly criticized by
organizations like MoveOn.org? I say respectfully the answer to all
those questions is, no.
In other words: Obama won't stand up to George Soros, MoveOn.org
and DFA, so why should we believe he would stand up to Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, Hamas and al-Qaeda?
topics:
Foreign Policy, John McCain, Military, Iraq