Matt Yglesias passes along an anecdote about
Jesse Helms saying something unflattering about interracial
marriage while criticizing some college protesters, concluding
snarkily "And George Bush, Mitch McConnell, National
Review, and the Heritage Foundation admire [Helms] greatly."
As if any of them admire Helms because of his 1960s racial views
rather than in spite of them.
The "hands" ad was perfectly legitimate and a factually accurate
description of the impact racial preferences can have on white
workers. But Helms did have an actual, regrettable record as a
racial segregationist early in his career (though he did in fact
shift toward color-blind rhetoric and policies later in his career,
even if he didn't apologize for his past statements). He defended
policies that hurt and denied opportunities to his black fellow
Americans. Conservatives should not minimize that or pretend he was an
early Ward Connerly. Neither should they discard all recognition of
Helms's real, substantial, and, yes, admirable accomplishments just
because he was, like all of us, a product of his time and place.
Perhaps Yglesias should have read that Soujournersarticle for its message of charity
as well as for its anecdotes.