Also at the Weekly Standard, Fred Barnes has an
interesting profile of several retiring House Republicans. What
really jumps out is a fact that he brings up in the opening: John
Dingell, Charlie Rangel, and John Conyers, who were no spring
chickens back in 1994, waited 12 years to get back into the
majority. A few committees and subcommittees are once again being
chaired by the very same people who chaired them the last time the
Democrats controlled Congress. Dozens of Republicans are rushing
toward the exits after just two years. What gives?
Barnes gives one good explanation: Many senior Democrats
expected to regain control of Congress quickly. In fact, the
Democrats started whittling away at the Republican majority as soon
as 1996. Republicans don't have any such expectation this time
around. But the large number of retirements, in districts many of
these retiring incumbents might have been able to hold this fall,
is one of the things that put Republican gains so far out of reach
in the first place. One wonders if Democrats, being members of the
party of government, simply like holding office better, on average,
than do Republicans. That may make Republicans quicker to retire
when they aren't enjoying themselves while Democrats are content to
wait a dozen years for their next majority or committee
chairmanship.