Wesley Clark defended his criticism of John McCain in a
statement
that concludes, "as an American and former military officer I will
not back down if I believe someone doesn't have sound judgment when
it comes to our nation's most critical issues."
For years, McCain argued that more troops and a better strategy
would improve conditions in Iraq and he tied his political fortunes
to the success of the surge -- and his judgment has been
vindicated.
But back when the surge was announced in January of 2007, Clark
wrote in an op-ed for the Independent that
the surge would backfire:
What the surge would do, however, is put more
American troops in harm's way, further undercut US forces' morale,
and risk further alienation of elements of the Iraqi populace.
American casualties would probably rise, at least temporarily, as
more troops are on the streets; we saw this when the brigade from
Alaska was extended and sent into Baghdad last summer. And even if
the increased troop presence initially intimidates or frustrates
the contending militias, it won't be long before they find ways to
work around the obstacles to movement and neighbourhood searches,
if they are still intent on pursuing the conflict. All of this is
not much of an endorsement for a troop surge that will impose real
pain on the already overstretched US forces....
The truth is that, however brutal the fighting in Iraq for our
troops, the underlying problems are political. Vicious ethnic
cleansing is under way right under the noses of our troops, as
various factions fight for power and survival. In this environment
security is unlikely to come from smothering the struggle with a
blanket of forces - it cannot be smothered easily, for additional
US efforts can stir additional resistance - but rather from more
effective action to resolve the struggle at the political
level.
topics:
John McCain, Environment, Military, Iraq, Alaska
