The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Whatever you think of Obama's sincerity, his Heller reaction does reflect significant rightward movement by the national Democratic Party on gun control. As recently as the 1990s, a Democratic presidential candidate would have been expected to denounce a Supreme Court decision like Heller and complain about a right-wing takeover of the courts. Even in his February statement on the D.C. handgun ban, Obama took pains to say that he wouldn't take guns away from people in Flyover country, just people in urban areas. I'll let others unpack some of the implications of this logic, but Obama has adopted the political approach pioneered by Howard Dean: let liberal areas of the country enact gun control laws but don't directly challenge the gun culture in more conservative parts of the country. He has obviously moved even further in this direction as he has to reach out beyond Democrats and win battleground states like Ohio and Pennsylvania.

These political concessions have limited policy implications, of course. My guess is that a unified Democratic government will be far more reluctant to advance gun control legislation than Bill Clinton and the Democrats in Congress were in 1993-94. But a President Obama would be likely to appoint judges who are hositle to Second Amendment rights and gun rights would become less secure as Democratic majorities became more secure.

topics:
Law, Supreme Court

About the Author

W. James Antle, III is associate editor of The American Spectator. You can follow him on Twitter at http://Twitter.com/Jimantle.

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/06/26/re-obamas-statement-on-heller

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT