How is it treasonous disloyalty to support America's ally
against America's enemies? Or does Joe Klein suppose that, if
Israel had been destroyed in the Yom Kippur war, her conquerors
would now be our friends? The real obstacle to Middle East peace is
the refusal of Israel's enemies to repudiate their repeated vows to
wipe Israel off the map.
Joe Klein seems to suggest that pro-Israel sentiment in the U.S.
is due entirely to the influence of American Jews, as if the other
98% of us are supporters of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. And his
use of "neoconservative" as a synonym for "Republican Jews" (or
"Jewish hawks") is equally misguided, demonstrating a profound
misunderstanding of the origins and content of neoconservatism.
Even if one is an anti-war
conservative, heeding Washington's warning against foreign
entanglements, this still does not validate Joe Klein's position,
since he's enthusiastically in favor of other foreign commitments:
the United Nations, carbon-emissions agreements, "humanitarian
intervention," etc. He very much reminds me of the old definition
of a liberal as someone who's afraid to take his own side in an
argument.
topics:
Israel, United Nations, Conservatism, Neoconservatism