Eli Lake in the New York Sun
writes of a curious omission in the Fulbright application
process: screening for terrorists. While
certainly not the first concern on anyone's mind when an American
submits an application to study celebratory costume in outer
Mongolia, it's worth looking into when a few flags come up. Below
is just such a "flag":
The three winners of American taxpayer-funded
Fulbright grants to study in America â€" Fidaa Abed,
Osama Dawoud, and Zohair Abu Shaban â€" have studied or
taught at the Islamic University of Gaza. An Israeli newspaper,
Yediot Ahronot, reported in 2007 that Islamic U. was one location
where a kidnapped Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, was kept after his
abduction in 2006. The newspaper also said forces loyal to
President Abbas had raided the university in 2007 and found stocks
of rifles and rocket launchers.
Israel is refusing to allow these three students from leaving the
country on account of this affiliation, and a U.S. congressman is
demanding answers as to why the Fulbright program is funding people
with "terrorist links" such as this.
With around 19,000 students attending the university, it would
surprise me to think that anyone involved with the school has a
"terrorist link." I'm a generally hawkish person, but I attended a
school with 12,000 and it was pretty hard to know what was going on
even then. If these guys are linked to terrorism by Israeli
intelligence, I think the university affiliation is a red
herring.
Whatever the case, it is surprising to hear that these folks
aren't vetted in such a way prior to participating in the Fulbright
program. But given the so-far hamfisted approach being suggested,
maybe it's better if we don't.
topics:
Islam, Israel