This morning on Laura Ingraham's show, I sidestepped a question
on this in order to make -- not very artfully, I'm afraid -- a
point I wanted to fit in before the end of the interview. Suffice
it to say, I haven't seen any evidence that gay marriage has an
enduring impact on the local economy either way. In the first six
months or so, as the backlog of same-sex couples who have wanted to
marry clears, I imagine the wedding industry receives a noticeable
boost. This will probably be especially true in California, since
there is already a defense-of-marriage amendment on this November's
ballot. But after the first six months or so, gay marriage tends to
become a fringe phenomenon. I'd be interested in any economic
literature that reinforces or contradicts my impressions.