The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Re: Gersonism

I'm not here to defend Gersonism, but I think it is fair to say Gersonism is not responsible for the terrible brand value of George W. Bush. Gersonism is probably very popular with the American people and would have served as a decent platform for a mix of school choice, welfare reform, pro-marriage policies, etc. All the momentum that was building nicely on those fronts has regrettably dissipated in two terms dedicated largely to foreign policy.

The problem with the Bush administration in the eyes of public has been and remains Iraq. It isn't discussed frequently enough, but I really believe the American people were not prepared for the type of war this has been. They thought it would be quickly prosecuted and that the reconstruction effort would be largely funded out of Iraqi oil revenues.

Instead, it has been long, expensive, and if it was a case of blood for oil, certainly doesn't seemed to have helped us on the price of the commodity!

topics:
Foreign Policy, Iraq, Oil

About the Author

Hunter Baker is associate dean of arts and sciences and associate professor of political science at Union University. He is the author of The End of Secularism and winner of the 2011 Michael Novak Award. His personal website is www.hunterbaker.wordpress.com.

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/05/31/re-gersonism

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT