It looks as though child pornography laws are the latest example of well-intentioned legislation that winds up threatening civil liberties.
Example one comes from R. Kelly’s child pornography trial, where Slate writer Josh Levin filed this dispatch:
The defendant in that case, Travis Carter, suggested that any of the neighbors could be using his wireless network. (The public defender’s office even sent out an investigator who confirmed that dozens of homes were within Wi-Fi range.)
But the magistrate judge ruled that even the possibilities of spoofing or other users of an open Wi-Fi connection “would not have negated a substantial basis for concluding that there was probable cause to believe that evidence of child pornography would be found on the premises to be searched.”The last example involves the least sympathetic character, a teen who posted naked pictures of his 16 year-old ex-girlfriend on the Internet (images she’d willingly sent him). I can’t say I’m sorry he’s been charged with defamation. But felony counts of child porn and sexual exploitation of a child? Sex offender registries ought to be designed for predators who pose a risk to kids, not teenage jerks.
And given the recent spate of probably exaggerated stories about kids sending one another naked photos through their cell phones, the laws we now have threaten to make a lot of sexually confused adolescents into felony sex offenders. Wouldn’t police resources be better spent protecting kids from child molestors? Or gangs?
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?